Axial offset passes

Axial offset passes

yoshimitsuspeed
Advisor Advisor
1,499 Views
6 Replies
Message 1 of 7

Axial offset passes

yoshimitsuspeed
Advisor
Advisor

Why do axial offset passes start above your top height?
I could see this being a very useful tool if it started at the top height then did axial offset passes however incrementing the whole toolpath up wastes a ton of time machining air and causes issues such as exceeding toolpath height.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1229995573786339/
0 Likes
1,500 Views
6 Replies
Replies (6)
Message 2 of 7

scottmoyse
Mentor
Mentor

It would be good if it trimmed the toolpaths to the top height. But otherwise it largely depends on the geometry you are applying it to, surely?


Scott Moyse
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.


EESignature


RevOps Strategy Manager at Toolpath. New Zealand based.

Co-founder of the Grumpy Sloth full aluminium billet mechanical keyboard project

0 Likes
Message 3 of 7

animo3d
Observer
Observer

I have been playing with axial offset passes en diferent types of machining. and found to be very inefficient, Like yoshi said machining air wastes a lot of time!, but even worst en the Horizontal type It doesn't even machines all the planes....

 

this diagram shows what is happening...

.axial.jpg

 

May be I'm doing something wrong? if it so... please let me know...

 

Best Regards

Sergio

Message 4 of 7

martin.dunschen
Autodesk
Autodesk

Hi @animo3d

 

Thanks for the illustration. It all depends on the use cases, and you have a point that in some use cases the axial offset approach does not give the best result, and then you would use a different strategy. Your suggestions of improvements are interesting and appreciated, you should post these on the "idea station" - where the community can comment and vote for your idea or suggestion.

 

The idea station is here: https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-360-ideastation-request-a/idb-p/125

 

Kind Regards

 

Martin

0 Likes
Message 5 of 7

yoshimitsuspeed
Advisor
Advisor

Name one situation where it's current behavior is better, needed or even the least bit correct? There is absolutely not reason why it should do this. No situation where this would be considered proper behavior. It is a bug or poor design. To call it anything else is ridiculous. 
And the idea station is an ultimate waste of time. 

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1229995573786339/
0 Likes
Message 6 of 7

al.whatmough
Alumni
Alumni

@yoshimitsuspeed I don't disagree with your request to handle this differently.  

 

I would like to better understand what you mean by the Idea Station being a waste of time.

 

---------
AL Whatmough
Director Product Management - Manufacturing

Note, I love to engage on the forums. However, I spend a lot of time in meetings trying to help clear the path for our amazing team of Developers working on Manufacturing at Autodesk. So, if I don't respond immediately, it's not that I don't care.
0 Likes
Message 7 of 7

starrtikimugs
Community Visitor
Community Visitor

@animo3d @yoshimitsuspeed did you ever figure this out?

 

I believe it's the Multiple Depths dialogue now but I think it's the same thing.

 

My machine is not zeroing so I need to cut one parallel pass in an emergency but can't plunge 6 inches into dense foam. Need to use multiple depths but it is completely unusable as is. Any help OR another solution would be GREATLY appreciated. 

0 Likes