Adaptive clearing ignoring certain areas

evanp4509U4JZ
Collaborator

Adaptive clearing ignoring certain areas

evanp4509U4JZ
Collaborator
Collaborator

Can anybody tell me why adaptive clearing is ignoring areas that parallel is picking up? In the attached file adaptive clearing ignores the mount locations ( kidney bean, oval and round "towers") in all but the first pass leaving towers nearly 5/8" tall. If I select "defect flat surfaces" it recognizes and removes the oval towards the muzzle but leaves the others.

Thanks in advance.

0 Likes
Reply
Accepted solutions (1)
499 Views
3 Replies
Replies (3)

HughesTooling
Consultant
Consultant
Accepted solution

I think using silhouette as your boundary was confusing the op because you had 4 bodies selected. If you select the outer profile of the main block as your boundary and select stock contours you get a good pocketing toolpath without any coalitions.

See attached file.

 

Mark

Mark Hughes
Owner, Hughes Tooling
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature


1 Like

evanp4509U4JZ
Collaborator
Collaborator

OK, Thank you. 

I never thought of it getting put off by that. I just assumed that everything within the boundary would be included. I didn't combine it because this is still prototype stage and the height of the mounts isnt set in stone yet and they're easier to move uncombined.

Thanks again

0 Likes

evanp4509U4JZ
Collaborator
Collaborator

I ran it the way you said and it worked fine. Then I ran it with the top perimeter of the mold selected as the " selection" as ended up with this anomaly in the corner. I tried it this way because we use a vacuum fixture with two fences to locate the raw material. The raw stock is 8x9 and the finished part is 7.5x8.5 so 1/4" around the part still leaves the fence untouched in case I forget to offset from the stock bottom in "heights". Should I sketch the mold perimeter and use that as the boundary? I don't understand how that would be different but I'm more concerned with what will work than why.

 

 

0 Likes