Weird behaviour on radius corners on groove finishing operation

Weird behaviour on radius corners on groove finishing operation

krisGPB83
Contributor Contributor
638 Views
9 Replies
Message 1 of 10

Weird behaviour on radius corners on groove finishing operation

krisGPB83
Contributor
Contributor

Hi,

 

I noticed that cycle does not include the full radius when doing the op.

Tool is grooving tool 2mm wide with R0.2 radius.

Front and Back on the geometry tab does include the radiuses (edges selected). Please see ss below

krisGPB83_0-1714060452268.png

 

Lead in as image below:

krisGPB83_1-1714060511086.png

 

 

But when I generate the cycle it does not include full rad thus does not generate nice 45deg lead-in:

krisGPB83_2-1714060543315.png

 

This is the first tool/material contact point, is misses part of radius marked in red:

krisGPB83_3-1714060642736.png

 

The only solution I found is to extend the geometry by 0.2mm then it is creating correct toolpath:

 

krisGPB83_4-1714060697672.pngkrisGPB83_5-1714060711133.png

 

 

Any reason why fusion does not include full rads when they are included in geometry?

File with model attached.

 

 

 

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
639 Views
9 Replies
Replies (9)
Message 2 of 10

programming2C78B
Advisor
Advisor

This is what you posted. Seems right to me

programming2C78B_0-1714129641351.png

 

Please click "Accept Solution" if what I wrote solved your issue!
0 Likes
Message 3 of 10

krisGPB83
Contributor
Contributor

Yes because front and back of the groove is offseted +0.2 and -0.2mm and they shouldn't - check the geometry tab on the operation.

0 Likes
Message 4 of 10

programming2C78B
Advisor
Advisor

I believe it's because you have a 0.2mm rad on the tool, and the front/back selections work as a way to constrain the edge of the insert (not the cutting edge) into that "window".

For example, you can make it even wider and it will still just cut that one groove with its rads

programming2C78B_0-1714132141057.png

 

Please click "Accept Solution" if what I wrote solved your issue!
0 Likes
Message 5 of 10

akash.kamoolkar
Autodesk
Autodesk
Accepted solution

@krisGPB83 Unfortunately groove finishing does not have the capability to use the back stock limit as a "contact point" boundary which would finish the radii fully. However, you can use the profile finishing strategy with a grooving tool with tool limit set to "contact point" that will give you the result you want.

 

Regards,



Akash Kamoolkar
Software Development Manager
0 Likes
Message 6 of 10

krisGPB83
Contributor
Contributor

Well, not really as profile finishing cycle will try to do it in one pass. How can I split it in the middle of the groove and do a lead out?

 

krisGPB83_0-1714144550462.png

 

0 Likes
Message 7 of 10

programming2C78B
Advisor
Advisor

Whats wrong with just using the 0.2mm offset? the path does exactly what you're after. I explained "why" it doesn't cut it properly when constraining it to just the edges.

Please click "Accept Solution" if what I wrote solved your issue!
0 Likes
Message 8 of 10

akash.kamoolkar
Autodesk
Autodesk

@krisGPB83 i've created a ticket to explore the possibility of adding a contact point tool limit to groove finishing.

 

Regards,



Akash Kamoolkar
Software Development Manager
0 Likes
Message 9 of 10

krisGPB83
Contributor
Contributor

I created this thread to understand the software behaviour and I do now so It's fine. Just when using different systems like EdgeCam when whole profile was selected with radiuses, tool was turning it complete. Here in fusion it work's differently and I couldn't understand why.

0 Likes
Message 10 of 10

krisGPB83
Contributor
Contributor

Thanks

0 Likes