Toolpath won't go to machining boundary

Toolpath won't go to machining boundary

Ariel
Advocate Advocate
984 Views
18 Replies
Message 1 of 19

Toolpath won't go to machining boundary

Ariel
Advocate
Advocate

I know you are going to tell me it is because the 16mm ballnose and for some odd reason it is unable to machine the area where the vertical wall meets the semi circle sweep.

 

Is there anything I am missing or I can do to get around it. I have tried all different combinations of containment, offset, contact, fillets etc etc and I can not get a better result that this pictured.

 

Cheers,

Ariel

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
985 Views
18 Replies
Replies (18)
Message 2 of 19

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

This sort of thing it helps if you post the file, it is hard to work out from the picks there are a few things that could do it from what you have selected for the toolpath or stock boundary to stepover, stock to leave or the ramp constraints and leads.

Tool size is not as much a problem as other toolpaths with the parallel op.


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes
Message 3 of 19

Ariel
Advocate
Advocate

Unfortunately I can't share it.

Containment is the chain just inside the oring groove, same I used for the adaptive clearing toolpath

 

Lead in/out 1.6mm/10%

No stock to leave

No ramp constraints

0 Likes
Message 4 of 19

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

You can PM it to me or one of the Autodesk guys will do an NDA.


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes
Message 5 of 19

Ariel
Advocate
Advocate

I just sent you a PM, thanks

0 Likes
Message 6 of 19

Anonymous
Not applicable

Did you tried scallop strategy???

What is the radius at part. Tool you said is 16mm ball nose, rite??

0 Likes
Message 7 of 19

Ariel
Advocate
Advocate

Not yet because that's not the toolpath I prefer bit I will give it a try. Yes 16mm ballnose. 

0 Likes
Message 8 of 19

Ariel
Advocate
Advocate

Same result with the scallop toolpath and reduced to a 12mm ballnose

0 Likes
Message 9 of 19

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

Now that I have had a proper look to try and fix this silly problem I can not, there is something completely wrong with the model or the cam workspaces it will not get closer than 20mm to the area in the pic, fusion staff members will need to have a look.

@jeff_strater can you plese have a look at this and see if you can work out what is wrong.

 

Screen Shot 2019-10-01 at 2.54.56 PM.png

 


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes
Message 10 of 19

Ariel
Advocate
Advocate

I had a funny feeling something like that might be wrong because regardless of the tool or toolpath used which is giving me similar end result

0 Likes
Message 11 of 19

seth.madore
Community Manager
Community Manager

@daniel_lyall share the file? You got my email address (if that's okay with @Ariel )


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing


0 Likes
Message 12 of 19

Ariel
Advocate
Advocate

@daniel_lyall no problems at all with me on you sharing it with @seth.madore 

0 Likes
Message 13 of 19

seth.madore
Community Manager
Community Manager

@Ariel  just email it to me, it might be quicker. Daniel is on the other side of the world, it's late evening there for him.

seth.madore@atudoesk.com

 


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing


0 Likes
Message 14 of 19

Ariel
Advocate
Advocate

on it's way

0 Likes
Message 15 of 19

seth.madore
Community Manager
Community Manager
Accepted solution

Alright, I've got answers!

All the 3D Toolpaths are "model aware", in that they "see" the part. It's not actually the part you see on screen, but rather, a generated STL that occurs in the background, nothing that we can see.

 

However! We have the option in modeling space to "Export as STL". With the tolerance set low enough, we export and bring it back in, and get this:
2019-10-01_09h44_28.png

 

What in tarnation is that?! I don't know, but I am opening up a ticket. 

So, how do we get around that? Go into your Parallel toolpath and open up the tolerance to .017. This will create an STL that does NOT have that doughnut....


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing


Message 16 of 19

seth.madore
Community Manager
Community Manager

This is logged as FUS-54886


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing


0 Likes
Message 17 of 19

Ariel
Advocate
Advocate

Thank you again Seth!!! It means I don't fall behind schedule which is what I was fearing.

 

Keep me posted on the details of the ticket.

 

Cheers,

Ariel

0 Likes
Message 18 of 19

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

Thank you, Seth you're the man, Another thing to remember to check for.


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

Message 19 of 19

seth.madore
Community Manager
Community Manager

Full disclosure; I didn't find that out on my own. We can thank @porsbym  for showing me the way on that.

Fwiw, the problem also shows up in Inventor 


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing