- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
Would it be a nice operation if we can carry out a parallel op without having to extend faces to stop the tool from dropping down each side in non necessary tool paths? I guess what I am saying is its never easy all the time. Even just an extension off a plane would be a good start.
Regardless. This part as simple as it is has taken a lot of work as it sticks out from my vice a LONG way. I am still working on the operations and am being super cautious to take small bites, starting at the very extent to retain some rigidity as the stock dissappears.
This post though I cant understand the last parallel operation seems to miss a portion of the surface leaving a triangle of stock. I dont know why because its not making sense, need a bit of help? Image attached is what I get in simulation it just totally misses a section. Weird? Yes
Oh, another question on parallel. I have a surface in the Y direction cutting in the X direction. I want the tool path to start and work in the negative direction towards the vice. This op starts at the vice and horizontal moves away from the vice. I cant work out how to change that? I tried a preferred entry point, Fusion just ignored it. Hmmmm
Solved! Go to Solution.