How do you handle large CNC Projects (Large GCode files)

How do you handle large CNC Projects (Large GCode files)

Anonymous
1,414 Views
11 Replies
Message 1 of 12

How do you handle large CNC Projects (Large GCode files)

Anonymous
Not applicable

https://a360.co/2xMcMwI

 

I have this project that exports a 20MB GCode file (for use in xcarve) and its too big for UGS. Im a new user (to both Fusion and CNCing in general), how do you handle something like that.

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
1,415 Views
11 Replies
Replies (11)
Message 2 of 12

seth.madore
Community Manager
Community Manager

That file is no joke!

I'd start by adjusting your tolerance and smoothing. Set them both to a larger value, leaving a little bit more stock. I'd also increase the size of your Minimum Stepdown, leaving more for a subsequent pass. 

 

What's the storage capacity of the UGS? I thought it could handle a lot more than that...


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing


0 Likes
Message 3 of 12

johnswetz1982
Advisor
Advisor

That looks symmetrical so you should only program one half them create a [Pattern] with a mirror in the Manufacture environment and post it out as 2 different operations. That should split your size in half. If you need to further reduce, split your design (one side) into 4 squares or something similar. Keep splitting until your at the files size you can handle. You can also try to turn on smoothing. that should reduce your files size.

0 Likes
Message 4 of 12

Anonymous
Not applicable

yeah, without smoothing its 35MB. I'm trying to loosen the tolerances up a little and ill try the pattern thing. I have no idea yet how to do that.

0 Likes
Message 5 of 12

Anonymous
Not applicable

Creating Identical Setups with Identical "Adaptive Cuts" with different boundaries? 

0 Likes
Message 6 of 12

johnswetz1982
Advisor
Advisor

Go back into design. Create a mid plane down the center of your part. Back to Manufacture. Under setup select pattern. You should choose mirror and the midplane previously created. That will create a folder. Do one side of your design and drag that operation under the pattern folder. That will flip your design to be symmetrical. That way you don't have to worry about updating one side of the design and not doing the same on the other. 

0 Likes
Message 7 of 12

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

you can do one side at a time from the model as it is.

 

What I would do and do is use a big tool to start with then go with a smaller tool then smaller tool again and or do a parallel toolpath to finish, this way you will have smaller tool paths.

 

You could use say 1/2in then 1/4in then 1/8in cutters to rough it out then when you go to finish it use a ball nose if you use a conical ball noses tool like this https://www.toolstoday.com/ball-nose-conical-ball-solid-carbide-spiral-cnc-2d3d-carving-tapered-and-...

you can cut a bit more of a depth of cut and width of cut and just cut faster. 


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes
Message 8 of 12

engineguy
Mentor
Mentor

@Anonymous 

 

Have you tried just "drip feeding" it ?? By far the easiest way, doesn`t matter what size the file is then 🙂 🙂

0 Likes
Message 9 of 12

Anonymous
Not applicable

here is my attempt:

 

https://a360.co/2xMcMwI

 

It has toolpaths where it shoudnt. Im sure i screwed up somewhere. It also take 4-5 hours for my 5GHz machine to create the toolpaths... 

 

I have also tried parallel, but that makes it take about 1/32 off that it shouldnt either. (I definitely probed the z axis and the piece is flat)

0 Likes
Message 10 of 12

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

What tool did you use for the parallel toolpath?


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes
Message 11 of 12

johnswetz1982
Advisor
Advisor
Accepted solution

See the linked, You only do one side and the pattern mirrors it for you. Click on the Folder then the individual operation to see the difference. You should try to rough it out before you try parallel. If it cut too much and you zeroed correctly perhaps the bit pulled out from too much force.

 

Check the feeds and speeds as I left them default. You had your tolerances way too tight for an art piece so I open them up. You final file will be much smaller.

 

https://a360.co/3deetmH 

0 Likes
Message 12 of 12

Anonymous
Not applicable

Thank you!

 

I went back in and did the same things you did (to learn) and the 1st file was about 1M(adaptive). and the 2nd was 700k(parallel)

0 Likes