G1 F0. as result of postprocessing: Feedrate zero?

G1 F0. as result of postprocessing: Feedrate zero?

harriebouwens
Enthusiast Enthusiast
1,067 Views
5 Replies
Message 1 of 6

G1 F0. as result of postprocessing: Feedrate zero?

harriebouwens
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

I was wondering if this is what you at Autodesk intended.  Changing the  conditions for Free Fusion360

 

(WHEN USING FUSION 360 FOR PERSONAL USE, THE FEEDRATE OF RAPID MOVES IS REDUCED TO MATCH THE FEEDRATE OF CUTTING MOVES, WHICH CAN INCREASE MACHINING TIME. UNRESTRICTED RAPID MOVES ARE AVAILABLE WITH A FUSION 360 SUBSCRIPTION.)

 

As can be seen in the attachements, the result of moving between 4 holes for drilling the speed is set to ZERO.

It took a while before I discovered that the reason for no movements at all of my CNC where the F0.]

Please help, if this behaviour is intended I do not understand you anymore.

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
1,068 Views
5 Replies
Replies (5)
Message 2 of 6

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

It is an error in the post they are trying to fix in all posts they maintain. 

@seth.madore here is another one.

 


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes
Message 3 of 6

seth.madore
Community Manager
Community Manager

@harriebouwens Y'all need to grab the latest update that just rolled out. We found this bug and (somewhat) quickly squashed it.


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing


Message 4 of 6

harriebouwens
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Thank you for the rapid reply, Iwill try it tomorrow

0 Likes
Message 5 of 6

harriebouwens
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Accepted solution

Thanks for this solution

0 Likes
Message 6 of 6

marcoose
Explorer
Explorer

While I am very thankful for free access to such amazing software, this new feedrate limit is quite difficult for my particular case.

 

As an overly conservative and fairly incompetent hobby machinist, I am using very small tools and painfully slow feedrates in my tinkering (4mm end mill, with < 0.5 ipm feed rate).  There's likely some optimization in terms of depth of cut and feed speed I could make, but I don't know what they are 🙂

 

For me wanting to cut a few carefully-spaced holes far apart into an aluminum plate, it looks like I'll now spend an hour cutting air.

 

I definitely understand the intention of preventing some unfair players from mass-producing with rapids, but as somebody without any experience and not wanting to sacrifice a lot of tiny end mills, I would really appreciate the addition of an absolute cap on the rapid speed.  Perhaps "no faster than cut speed OR 10 ipm, whichever is greater".  Then at least the scaredy-cats with questionable tooling and rigidity in their machines can cut at a glacial pace, but step up the rapids to a snails pace.

0 Likes