Hello @downthedrainstudios , @johnswetz1982
John, you are partially right, in your answer.
But it also means you are partially wrong.
Let me clarify the "problem".
The .machine MUST be used in 2 situations actually.
When you are using the machine simulation, you need a .machine that is referencing the 3dmodel for the machine, and contains the kinematics and machine capabilities.
In the Additive workspace, for creating an fff toolpath, you NEED a .machine file, or else no toolpath will be created.
For milling and turning, we can now create toolpaths, and post process, without needing to associate a .machine file.
But the plan in the near future, it to spread the use of the . machine configuration file.
When dealing with 4-5 axis mill or 3-??? axis turn mill machine, it will be a bonus, allowing to create a kinematic in this file to use with a generic post.
If we have for example a MPOL 4 axis mill, and a FRED 5 axis mill, the kinematic will be defined in .machine files, but we could use the same R45T post for both machines.
For the specific case of @downthedrainstudios , at the time, the .machine file will not add anything to the workflow.
Hope this will clarify the role of both files for others Forum visitors...
Have a pleasant day.
Regards.
PS : Yes John, i also cross posted... 😮