3D adaptive rest machining not working

3D adaptive rest machining not working

david_masshardt
Explorer Explorer
2,210 Views
16 Replies
Message 1 of 17

3D adaptive rest machining not working

david_masshardt
Explorer
Explorer

I'm having some trouble with the 3d adaptive rest machining. I'm trying to mill a model with a 3 mm tool first, then do the details with a 1 mm tool. But no matter what settings I'm using in the second operation in for rest machining Fusion 360 always generates a full path for the 1 mm tool instead of just machining the parts the 3 mm tool could not get into. I tried with and without stock to leave and I did set the rest machining source to previous operation.

 

Any ideas what I could be doing wrong here?

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
2,211 Views
16 Replies
Replies (16)
Message 2 of 17

Anonymous
Not applicable

@david_masshardt 

 

It would be nice if you could attach file with your design.

0 Likes
Message 3 of 17

david_masshardt
Explorer
Explorer

Here are some pictures. In the SecondPass picture everything is milled again even though rest milling is active. I found out that I can also mill this with a 2d adaptive operation, there it works better. But I would still like to know what I'm doing wrong here in the 3d adaptive operation.

0 Likes
Message 4 of 17

johnswetz1982
Advisor
Advisor

It could be stock to leave, tool, other settings. Cant tell with only pictures.

0 Likes
Message 5 of 17

david_masshardt
Explorer
Explorer

Here is the whole f3d file. It's just an example I made to test my new cnc machine.

0 Likes
Message 6 of 17

Anonymous
Not applicable

@david_masshardt 

 

In both Adaptive ops you should probably select Flat Area Detection, otherwise bootom plane is calculated with given tolerance. In second Adaptive Ignore Cusps for Rest Machining definetly should be selected. And maybe tolerances should bit more tight.

0 Likes
Message 7 of 17

david_masshardt
Explorer
Explorer

I just changed all those settings and did set both tolerances to 0.01, but the second pass still machines the whole part. Any other ideas?

0 Likes
Message 8 of 17

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor
Accepted solution

Have a look at the attached model it was just a few settings needing to be changed most where what you were already told to try, and I selected what to cut.


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

Message 9 of 17

david_masshardt
Explorer
Explorer

Thanks for the help. I guess the biggest difference is that I used the silhouette setting and you used a selection of the outer circle and the inner path.

0 Likes
Message 10 of 17

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

Sometimes you have to use a selection so the rest machining knows where to cut.


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes
Message 11 of 17

Coras_Alin
Collaborator
Collaborator

most of the time second tool enters to heavy in the leftover material, even if the rest operation settings are good. I think this should be default avoided pe the software, nobody wants that.

0 Likes
Message 12 of 17

Coras_Alin
Collaborator
Collaborator

it should be good if someone makes a tutorial on how its the best to use rest. (ignore, machine or compute cusps, and what values in any situations...)

Message 13 of 17

Kzinty
Advocate
Advocate

The whole point of rest machining is to cut the remainder of the stock with the new tool selected as prescribed in the subsequent tool path. If I have to tell 360 where to cut then the rest machining function is not working. I just spend 30 minutes trying to figure out why my tool paths are not rest machining and found the CUSP's to be my culprit. I tried all 3 options with 0.000 and 0.010 but nothing worked than suddenly after I edited the tool's speed, SFM, and chip load, the cusp calculation started to work, all 3 options. Attached is a file with the cusp calc working and a file with it not working.

0 Likes
Message 14 of 17

engineguy
Mentor
Mentor

@Kzinty 

 

FYI, it is much better to just upload the f3d file and not an f3z file, just makes it hard work to separate stuff out.

 

No software will perform well if the user is not proficient so you get the level of use comensurate with the level of expertise. Doesn`t mean the software is "bad" !!

0 Likes
Message 15 of 17

Kzinty
Advocate
Advocate

I will remember that about the f3d. I hope that's a signature, I didn't say Fusion360 is bad. I actually like it for most of my work. There are a few areas that need improvement but overall very very good value for the money.

0 Likes
Message 16 of 17

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

Doing a derived second op directly from the first adaptive gives you the same settings you just change the tool depth and with of cut and tick rest machining and any other setting that was set in the first op stays unless you change it, this can speed up the possess quite a bit if you need to get the tool paths out the door.


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

Message 17 of 17

Kzinty
Advocate
Advocate

That is exactly how I made all but the 1st toolpaths.

0 Likes