Hello together, Currently, user management in Fusion Manage requires manual effort or custom integrations, which are neither scalable nor aligned with IT security standards (ISO 27001) in enterprise environments. This Idea is about implementing a standard, out-of-the-box solution for managing users and their permissions in Fusion Manage via Microsoft Active Directory (AD) Groups.    This functionality is essential for large organizations aiming for increased security and better compliance with internal and external standards. Importanly, this capability must be part of the Fusion Manage standard configuration to avoid the need for custom middleware or bespoke development - which often requires  unavailable internal capacity and ongoing maintenance.   By enabling native AD group integration, Autodesk would significantly enhance the usability, scalability and security of Fusiion Manage - making it a more viable option for enterprise-wide deployment.     Kind regards, Ole-Jendrik Schmidt Show More

Similar to ACC, Fusion Manage should allow users to markup a PDF and download the file with every markup. This is useful for companies dealing with vendors who need to be able to download the PDF with all markups and don't have access to it any other way.    Other Autodesk tools are using this capability and there is redlining capabilities already within FM for DWF and DWG file types. This request is not uncommon for FM users, as there is an idea submitted for it going back to 2019. (https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manage-ideas/dwf-or-pdf-markup/idc-p/9348663#M3992) Show More

Within the Security Users window we should have the ability to apply filters for active/inactive/deleted users as well as define and save sorting or various views just as we can elsewhere in the tenants. When managing a tenant with many users, having this added functionality would improve the abilities of admins to more easily manage their users.   Similar ideas have been previously submitted (https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-manage-ideas/filter-for-security-users-view/idi-p/7691416) Show More

Autodesk Plattforms are using the Autodesk Forge Viewer to View Files. In Autodesk Docs Plattform the Autodesk Forge Viewer can view all the files from in the help here: DOCS Help | Supported Files on Web | Autodesk   Why in Autodesk Fusion Manage we can only view the files from in help here and not the same as in Autodesk Docs (ACC): Fusion Manage Help | Attachments | Autodesk   Please add the same file formats as in Autodesk Docs (ACC) too in Fusion Manage Attachments Viewer.   Show More

We have the need to produce a BOM that can have the same item used multiple times at the same level rather than increase the quantity, see below:   Imagine a simple assembly with two children as per fusion can currently produce: Machine Assembly                                                        x1 Bracket                                                                 x2 Plate                                                                     x3 With the above it is only possible to increase the quantity of each item.   What we require is: Machine Assembly                                                        x1 Bracket                                                                 x2 Plate                                                                     x1 Plate                                                                     x1 Plate                                                                     x1   Adding further child items can be included as new lines not increasing the quantity. I’m imagining a toggle (or similar) on the place component dialogue that allows the user to pick either increase quantity (the default option) or add new line item as above. The reason for this is to add extra property information to a BOM view such as location ID’s or similar for the individual components, If the quantities are grouped then this information cannot be accurately maintained. I have seen workarounds that use the grid to maintain this data, but this makes the syncing to ERP and ongoing maintenance of the BOM overly complex. Show More

we should be able to see what transitions were executed by a delegate. currently a report or view will only show the action performed by the original user that was on the record not the delegation.  Show More

We are currently using Fusion Manage for our ECR process. One large issue for my department as coordinator of this process is the scheduling of tasks. We have used templates to create tasks for different teams.   Right now, there is two options: Create all tasks and initiate them at the same time. Create some tasks, wait for them to finish and then create dependent tasks Option 1 will create a lot of tasks which cannot be started by the assignees, because they are missing information from predecessor tasks. People are forced to regularly check the status of tasks they are dependent on. After a while tasks become a mess.   Option 2 is what we are doing right now. This causes a lot of overhead on our side. So we will have to initiate task A. When this is done, we will get information from Fusion, because there are no open tasks. Then we will have to check the template manually, which would be the next consecutive tasks and create that manually, assign and initiate it.   It would help us much, if there would be either an option to initiate only a selection of tasks which have been created by template or (even better) link tasks as predecessors and successor (GANT basics) so that completion of task A will trigger initiating task B.     Show More

Fusion Manage is a powerful product lifecycle management (PLM) solution, but its accessibility is currently limited to web-based usage. To enhance usability and productivity, I propose that the Fusion Manage product team develop a dedicated mobile app for iPhone and iPad (iOS). A Fusion Manage mobile app would provide several key benefits: On-the-Go Access: Users can review, approve, and manage workflows from their iPhone or iPad, ensuring productivity anytime, anywhere. Improved Collaboration: Push notifications for approvals, change requests, and tasks would enable faster response times. Optimized for iPad: A larger screen experience would make it easier to interact with complex workflows, dashboards, and reports. Offline Mode: Allow users to review project details and tasks even when working in areas with limited connectivity. Touch & Apple Pencil Support: Improve document markup and annotations for reviews and approvals directly on iPad. A native iOS app would provide a seamless, modern experience for engineers, project managers, and stakeholders, making Fusion Manage more accessible and effective. Show More

Currently, the “Combine” command in Fusion 360 only allows you to select a single target body and multiple tool bodies. However, in many projects it makes sense to combine multiple bodies in a single step Therefore, I suggest extending the “Combine” dialog so that multiple target bodies and multiple tool bodies can be selected and processed in a single operation. This would speed up workflows and reduce the number of “Combine” operations required. Examples/use cases: Creating multiple cut-outs at the same time If, for example, you have a design in which several bodies are to be cut out at the same time, you would currently have to select each target body separately and assign the same tool body several times. Multiple selection would simplify the work enormously here. Combining complex assemblies If several components in an assembly are to be merged into one body, it would be practical to merge all target bodies in one go. Save time and clicks Less switching between different dialogs and fewer individual operations make work more efficient and clearer. Advantages: Reduced time expenditure: Instead of carrying out several “Combine” operations individually, everything can be done in one step. Better overview: Fewer entries in the timeline and fewer manual steps. Fewer sources of error: Having only one operation reduces the risk of forgetting a body or combining it incorrectly. Additional notes (optional): Perhaps this could be implemented via a “Select multiple target bodies” checkbox, which only extends the known UI behavior without replacing it. A similar logic as is possible with the tool body Translated with DeepL.com (free version) Show More