Fusion
@22JE0190 wrote:
...
And also I know that it's very easy with solid workspace but I'm learning surface modelling so I was just practicing...
.
Practicing surface modeling on designs that don't require it, has negligible learning effects!
I see nothing wrong with learning surface modeling techniques using geometry that doesn’t really require surface modeling techniques. In fact, I have written tutorials that do exactly this for beginners.
I notice that you did not Attach your file here?
Show me yours - I show you mine.
@TheCADWhisperer wrote:
I see nothing wrong with learning surface modeling techniques using geometry that doesn’t really require surface modeling techniques. In fact, I have written tutorials that do exactly this for beginners.
I would agree, as long as the student does not move ahead after these basic exercises to start modeling a boat or airplane fuselage. That requires some understanding of what a NURBS surface is 😉
So you're trying to say that even on the surface you have no idea how cad modeling works.
Are you trying to do this. You're trying to model surface relationships?
If you want to do it after the model is created. Split body works. Because, trim will remove sections you need. And, split face doesn't need to extend the split tool. But, there is no way to remove the surface from the body surface. I'm not sure if there is a way to do that. I would prefer that.
@wersy wrote:
...
Surfaces should only be used where there is no other way or where it has certain advantages....
Spot on! That is exactly what I was trying to say (but kinda didn't).