Problem with a simple assembly

Problem with a simple assembly

lemelman
Collaborator Collaborator
675 Views
13 Replies
Message 1 of 14

Problem with a simple assembly

lemelman
Collaborator
Collaborator

I have a rectangular tray with rounded corners and need to place moulded edging on each of the four corners.

I created two sketches; one for the profile of the moulding and one for the plan, then swept the profile along the plan and created a component from the result. Then copied it 3 times.

One at a time I assembled each moulding to each corner by using the joint origin of the arc centre of the top flat of the moulding and the arc centre of the bottom surface of the tray. That all seemed to work OK, BUT...

Looking straight down on the tray the mouldings don't line up. They each seem to be rotated slightly around the start of the plan line of the plan sketch. Why? The plan sketch clearly shows that the 2 legs are perpendicular.

 

 

Here are some screenshots to illustrate theEdging Profile.jpgEdging plan.jpgTraytop.jpgAn edging.jpgedges assembled.jpgAssembled + sketches.jpg problem.

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
676 Views
13 Replies
Replies (13)
Message 2 of 14

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

You've been on this forum long enough to know what the next question is we ask , so ...


EESignature

Message 3 of 14

davebYYPCU
Consultant
Consultant

Path sketch is perpendicular, but the last picture shows the edging is out of square.

why was this not one Sweep, around the table, and then cut into sections?

 

No data, just guesses.

Message 4 of 14

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

@davebYYPCU wrote:

 

why was this not one Sweep, 

 


I possibly would not even use a sweep.


EESignature

0 Likes
Message 5 of 14

lemelman
Collaborator
Collaborator

I couldn't use a single sweep because the moulding was to be 3D printed and it would have been too big for the printer.

I should have included the.f3d, but was interrupted before I'd finished, and then forgot. Sorry. Here it is

0 Likes
Message 6 of 14

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

@lemelman wrote:

I couldn't use a single sweep because the moulding was to be 3D printed and it would have been too big for the printer.

LOL.

 

TrippyLighting_0-1653399666929.png

 


EESignature

0 Likes
Message 7 of 14

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

Your design has 8 warnings and 1 error in the timeline.

You've been using Fusion 360 for quite a while now, so its time to step up your game and fix that stuff!

 


EESignature

Message 8 of 14

TheCADWhisperer
Consultant
Consultant

Are your sketches fully defined?

0 Likes
Message 9 of 14

g-andresen
Consultant
Consultant

Hi,

Your canvases don't give me any clues as to what is to be created in the end, which is partly due to the fact that there are no recognizable top or side profiles.
Please show with pictures of a real object what it is all about.

 

günther

0 Likes
Message 10 of 14

lemelman
Collaborator
Collaborator

This model is for a collapsible tray on a special wheeled zimmer-frame for a bariatric patient, the manufacturers of which are unable to supply. The frame is foldable and the strange angles of the various parts make a straightforward design impossible.

The tray is just a flat piece of plywood which needs a raised edge to minimise the possibility of plates sliding off when the client moves the frame. The raised edging is 3D printed but, because of it's size, has to be printed in parts - that's why I created one part that is printed 4 times.

Here are some photos of the actual zimmer-frame and a couple of screenshots of the actual model.

Side.jpgPlan.jpg3D.jpg3-4 View.jpgSide view.jpg

0 Likes
Message 11 of 14

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

@lemelman attached is a file with a modeling approach for the tray edging that does not use a single sketch.

You should be able to apply that directly to your design.

 

TrippyLighting_0-1653411731155.png

 


EESignature

0 Likes
Message 12 of 14

jeff_strater
Community Manager
Community Manager

There are no doubt other ways to model this, and I encourage you to look at those other approaches.  However, to start to answer your original question, first we need to look at the joint failures.  Those are the ones that are specific to your problems.  The other errors in your design might be related, but because you asked a joint question, let's start with the joints.  If you do "Review Warning" on the first of those failures, you will get:

Screen Shot 2022-05-24 at 9.22.53 PM.png

 

and, if you edit that joint you can see that a reference is missing for Component1:

Screen Shot 2022-05-24 at 9.23.15 PM.png

 

So, my first recommendation is to try to fix those errors.  With those errors, it is no wonder that the parts do not align.  I would try to fix them, but I don't know exactly what you had picked for those joints.  If you are able to fix those, then we can look at the design again, if the parts are still mis-aligned.


Jeff Strater
Engineering Director
0 Likes
Message 13 of 14

lemelman
Collaborator
Collaborator

Thanks Peter, that's really neat - I've rather avoided surface modelling 'till now, and have sort-of regarded it as a black art. It's clearly time to spend some effort in getting to grips with it.

0 Likes
Message 14 of 14

lemelman
Collaborator
Collaborator
Accepted solution

Thanks for your response Jeff. Actually, I think I've now found the problem.

I think that the joint honours the flat horizontal surfaces of the components (top surface of the edging and bottom surface of the tray), then matches one end of the edging vertical surface against the tray and the inner tangential point of the fillet radius, at the centre of the curve, against the edge of the tray, thus causing the far end of the edging to be misaligned.

So, it appears that the internal fillet of the edging is confusing the joint origin of the edging. When I removed it the parts fitted with no distortion.