object snaps
Hi @Anonymous,
Fusion does not today support OSnaps like Rhino or AutoCAD. However there is an idea in the IdeaStation for this: object-snap-is-really-needed, so if this is something you feel is needed, feel free to vote for it.
Jeff
Jeff Strater
Engineering Director
141 votes and its still just a consideration? Is there a reason this is not on the roadmap? Just curious.
Phil Procario Jr.
Owner, Laser & CNC Creations
If this was some advanced feature that no other CAD app had I could understand, but this is considered to be a pretty basic feature that is standard in every cad app I have ever used. The fact that it is 3 years old and a basic standard feature.... kind of makes the Ideastation concept seem flawed....
Just my 2 cents
Phil Procario Jr.
Owner, Laser & CNC Creations
One of the reasons I never complained about not have toggle options for snaps is because of the intelligent snaps that do exist, but I have to be honest sometimes the intelligent snaps are annoying at best and I would like to disable them and just do manual snapping. I don't always want to snap to everything. Sometimes I just want to snap to a point, sometimes I just want to snap to an edge or a center point. Case in point thank god we can turn off auto projection because it clutters up a sketch very fast. If I want to project a point, line, arc, etc...I will hit the P key and project it....I should be able to do the same with snaps. I toggle box like this:
The other issue in question here is I have seen things get less then 10 votes and next thing I know it's a new feature...and yes I understand that the code was probably in place and it took little effort to impliment said feature, but anything that has 100+ votes should be considered to be important in the grand scheme of things. Like I said this is just my opinion though.
Phil Procario Jr.
Owner, Laser & CNC Creations
I don't remember ever seeing them in other solid modelers I've used, not that that a reason Fusion shouldn't do something new. The new midpoint snap gets in the way all the time, I'd definitely like to turn that one off most of the time.
Mark
Mark Hughes
Owner, Hughes Tooling
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
fair enough, @PhilProcarioJr. This one is a bit of an internal debate, as well as a priority/resource issue. As @LibertyMachine suspects, there is some thought that believes that you should not need object snaps, that OSnaps are really more appropriate for a non-parametric modeler like Rhino or AutoCAD. There is some question, for a parametric modeler, whether OSnaps, if we implemented them would create persistent constraints (think quadrant points on a circle - is that just a temporary snap, or a constraint that says this point has to always be on a quadrant point?). I'm sure we'll get there eventually, in some form.
Jeff
Jeff Strater
Engineering Director
"there is some thought that believes that you should not need object snaps, that OSnaps are really more appropriate for a non-parametric modeler like Rhino or AutoCAD."
Ah but here we have our first issue Fusion is BOTH parametric and non-parametric. I now find myself using T-Splines more and more and now I'm pulling my hair out because I don't have this basic functionality. Take any Maya or 3dsMax user tell them they can't use snaps and watch them flip out. 
In T-splines when splitting faces you do get a snap to the middle of a line but that's it, and I have to be honest all that does is tease at whats possible and show a limitation of the tools.
I could go on and on about whats missing from the T-Spline environment but I will leave that for another day.
All CAD, polygon, sub-d, and NURBS modeling apps can benefit from snaps. I don't care if they are parametric or not and let me explain why.
Fast conceptual design and iteration...My clients have ideas and most of the time those ideas are not fully realized. I need fast ways to do this and what I find myself doing is relying more and more on Maya and Lightwave. Don't get me wrong I never want to stop using those apps but I would like to spend more time in Fusion getting things done and less time jumping back and forth...
The smart shops that develop prototypes of new design concepts will use a polygon modeler like Maya, 3dsmax, Modo, Lightwave..etc. to flesh out a design fast. This is why Modo and Solidworks jumped into bed together. They saw the need and so should Autodesk. Why do they do this because then can model out a design 10x faster in those apps. Since we already know why they can do it faster in those apps we will move on.
"There is some question, for a parametric modeler, whether OSnaps, if we implemented them would create persistent constraints (think quadrant points on a circle - is that just a temporary snap, or a constraint that says this point has to always be on a quadrant point?)."
Please make sure you let the Devs know NOT to create constraints based on snaps, or at the very least allow us to turn that on and off because automatic constraint creation drives me and many others crazy in other CAD apps. I know of much better ways to handle this with the snapping options I talked about earlier and if you or the other devs would like to discuss this I am always available to talk.
Thanks for your time Jeff.
Phil Procario Jr.
Owner, Laser & CNC Creations
@jeff_strater I have a couple of ideas, how about adding 2 rows of radio buttons to the sketch palette, there's plenty of room.
One row would allow the user to pick which snaps are running all the time, like I said the mid point snap gets in the way all the time. See this screen cast where someone's trying to demonstrate a bug, look how many times the midpoint snap gets in the way!
Then have a second row of buttons that are one shot, so you'd select end point for example, for just the next selection only endpoints would be available. One thing I've noticed, there's no centre point snap, if you have a big arc you have to zoom out until you can see the centre point and pick it, you can't even use a concentric constraint between a line end point and an arc.
@jeff_strater wrote:
if we implemented them would create persistent constraints (think quadrant points on a circle - is that just a temporary snap, or a constraint that says this point has to always be on a quadrant point?).
Jeff
I see the snaps would add constants by the way.
Mark
Mark Hughes
Owner, Hughes Tooling
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
I agree with you, @HughesTooling about that midpoint snap on dimension/constraint. I find I rarely use it, and the rest of the time it gets in the way. Similarly in Measure, the snap points get in the way, IMO. So, it would be nice to be able to shut those off easier. We have been having discussions recently about these topics. Part of the problem is that there is not just a single snap mechanism in Fusion. Sketch snapping during curve creation is different than during constraint/dimension creation, and snapping for Measure/Joints/Align is another system. So, we'd like to unify all this if we can.
Your ideas about using the sketch palette are good ones, I think. Although we have also been talking about a weight loss program for the palette, since it takes up so much room already.
Thanks for the input, we value and appreciate input from the people who spend so much time in Fusion.
Jeff
Jeff Strater
Engineering Director
