Fusion360 WAY TOO HARD

Fusion360 WAY TOO HARD

Anonymous
Not applicable
10,284 Views
43 Replies
Message 1 of 44

Fusion360 WAY TOO HARD

Anonymous
Not applicable

Anyone else think this is the HARDEST most difficult program to use?

 

Sketchup is SO MUCH easier...

 

You can't even COPY AND PASTE in this LAME program...  Good thing I didn't pay for it... WOW... I spent 40 minutes trying to simply draw a 23mmx45mm square with some simple cutouts. I did this in Sketchup in literally 6 minutes...

 

The ONLY reason I have this software is to model my threads for printing...

 

So frustrated....

 

Edited by
Discussion_Admin

Accepted solutions (1)
10,285 Views
43 Replies
Replies (43)
Message 2 of 44

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hello @Anonymous

There are several training videos and tutorials that you could use to help make your experience with this software better for you, here are some links:

https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/fusion-360

https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/fusion-360/learn-explore?sort=score

https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/fusion-360/getting-started?sort=score

 

Fusion 360 is an amazing software that is easy to learn and the more you practice, the easier it gets. It is engineered to perfection and it work wonders.

 

For copying and pasting, please use CTRL + C and CTRL + V respectively. Fusion 360 does support for copying and pasting a lot of stuff.

Hope this helps.

Best of luck!

 

 

0 Likes
Message 3 of 44

etfrench
Mentor
Mentor
Accepted solution

Wow, it looks like Sketchup is at least three times slower than Fusion 360 Smiley Tongue 

 

 

 

 

 

Instead of venting, asking for help would have you modeling much more quickly and efficiently.  It would also pay to go through the learning exercises located in a link at the top of the forum.

ETFrench

EESignature

Message 4 of 44

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

I posted this response earlier today in another thread and in response to another user. The same applies here:

 

@Anonymous 

Maybe you want to take a step back and consider that this is not for you!

 

You downloaded a piece of software that took one of the biggest software companies in the world years and  millions of dollars to develop. That company decided to make this software  free for hobbyist. All you have to do os to watch a hour of video tutorials particularly aimed at beginners.

 

If you did watch these tutorials and still cannot manage to edit a box then this is clearly not for you.

If you did not even watch any of the tutorial material that also took quite a while to develop and that again was made available to you at no cost other than an hour of your time

 

Edited by
Discussion_Admin


EESignature

Message 5 of 44

Anonymous
Not applicable

Wow! Ok... this was pretty impressive... Thanks!!

0 Likes
Message 6 of 44

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

 

Here is a link to the Support and Learning section I mentioned earlier. It's located right on top of the forum.

 

Edited by
Discussion_Admin


EESignature

Message 7 of 44

jeff_strater
Community Manager
Community Manager

Please remember that this is a professional forum, and we should all act accordingly.

 

Jeff


Jeff Strater
Engineering Director
Message 8 of 44

Discussion_Admin
Alumni
Alumni

Everyone,

 

As Jeff mentioned please remember these are professional forums and as such deserve a professional decorum when participating.

Thanks
Discussion_Admin

0 Likes
Message 9 of 44

robduarte
Collaborator
Collaborator

I too think this idea that software might just "not be for you" is legitimate. There are too many options in the world to try and fit a square peg into a round hole. If Sketchup is working for you, then maybe that's the right tool for the work that you're doing. Having used both for years, I can tell you that they are each good at solving different types of problems. (Of course I can also say that I have not used Sketchup in years, since Fusion 360 is most often the exact tool that I need).

Rob Duarte
Associate Professor in Art, Florida State University
Co-Director FSU Facility for Arts Research
http://art.fsu.edu/rob-duarte/

Twitter | YouTube

Message 10 of 44

chrisplyler
Mentor
Mentor

Admin neutered this thread before I even got a change to insult anybody. That's what I get for sleeping!

 

Message 11 of 44

Anonymous
Not applicable
I'm going to jump in with a heavy dose of positive and say the modeling and simulations in fusion 360 are the most user friendly I've ever seen...so this is a very good software package from a design and engineering standpoint.

It's just designed for type of user that would be comparing it with solidworks, creo, ansys... etc
0 Likes
Message 12 of 44

Anonymous
Not applicable

Actually...

 

You can CTRL C / CTRL V pretty much anything. This includes sketches, sketch entities, bodies and components.

 

The best part is you get a move / rotate option as soon as you paste.

 

🙂

0 Likes
Message 13 of 44

Anonymous
Not applicable

For me, I use parameters that I can change model only to change numbers and model comes correct

0 Likes
Message 14 of 44

hectorkal
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Sorry to hear that. I come from SU too. However it is not that fusion is so much harder, it is just a bit more complicated. Because there are many more functions. However for such a complicated program it seems to be quite easy.. 

The videos from Lars Christensen on youtube are a good way to get familiar with fusion. 

0 Likes
Message 15 of 44

Anonymous
Not applicable

I was an early adopter of the 3ds studio and loved the intuitive interface, it was actually a great starting point. I used 3dsMAX for a short time and was relieved to see that Autodesk had retained some of the original look and feel.. I have been retired form that industry for a while and thought I would try out Fusion 360 to see how things have advanced. All I can say is that Autodesk is absolute tripe now! It is easiest the least intuitive interface that I have ever seen in my thirty years of graphics and computing! It is aesthetic but at the cost of being usable. All I can say is that I am pleased that Autodesk has priced itself out of the general market place because frankly they have created a platform for experts only. Gone are the days when Autodesk had software that was user friendly. I spent 2 hours trying to taper a rectangle. I even went on the help forums and it proved my point, the 'experts' describe the process in a manner that is 100% alien to a novice, thus adding value to their 'expert' status. 

The truly sad part about this is that products such as Blender which has a 'real' community,, that can actually speak on the user level. I achieved in Blender within less than a minute what I wasted two hours of my life trying to do in Fusion 360. Given my history with Autodesk, this (Autodesk) is a very very sad day. 

Long live the enthusiast.

 

Edited by
Discussion_Admin

Message 16 of 44

lichtzeichenanlage
Advisor
Advisor

I'm a hobbyist. I had more or less no CAD experience before. I don't have any problems to understand Fusion 360 and I don't think the UI is bad. Perfect? Nope - but what is perfect...

Message 17 of 44

helibum
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Plus, I find it ironic that you'd compare Fusion 360 to Blender for usability. Talk about an awful, unintuitive user interface; Blender is the poster child.

 

The trick with Fusion 360 is to somewhat plan ahead. Then it makes the job of going back through the history to tweak something a piece of cake.

Message 18 of 44

Anonymous
Not applicable

To add to this, Blender isn't even in the same product family as Fusion 360.

 

F360 is an engineering tool, whereas blender is just for shapes. It's like comparing a wheelbarrow (blender) to a pickup truck (f360). One may take less experience to operate and the other is capable of a substantially greater amount of work.

 

I'm not sure where all of the hostility is coming from...was it a response to deleted threads or something?

Message 19 of 44

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

@Anonymous  Anyone with 30 years of experience in any industry should have enough maturity and quite frankly plain common sense not to post profanities and insults right with the first post when stepping into a new community of users.

This is a professional forum and your post will be reported to the discussion admin. The language will be corrected.

 

I can certainly understand the frustration when one has to cross the chasm between these two very different approaches to 3D modeling and modeling is usually the first thing one has to do in Sub-D modeling and animation software or in CAD.

 

Comparing Sub-D modeling and animation software and a CAD software, any CAD software makes absolutely no sense. While either are used for modeling things in 3D the approach both are taking is different and there is a reason for that that clearly not very many people understand.

Most people that have ever only used CAD software are utterly lost when they are in a Sub-D modeling environment.

That same goes for many people that have spent too log Sub-D modeling and did not manage to broaden their horizon.

 

The purpose of a CAD software is to create physical artifacts. The main approach to that is to represent 3D geometry with BRep and (trimmed) NURBS surfaces. Both of these representations are mathematically precise and essentially don't have a finite resolution. This aim to create physical artifacts drives in many cases how the modeling tools work and how the UI is constructed. However, NURBS surfaces are rather difficult to manipulate/deform if one wants to animate things, for example.

 

That is why meshes - first plain polygon modeled meshes and later Sub-D - very early on replaced NURBS surfaces in tools such a Maya. Meshes are much more pliable and easier to deform and shapes are easily created that seem impossible with NURBS surfaces. However, meshes have a finite resolution, which is why in the past they often were not used to create physical artifacts (with the popularity of 3D printing that has changed).   That also resulted in very different tool sets and UI's.

 

A word on Blender.  I've used that software for over 15 years. In that time there have been many threads on blenderartists.org (previously Elysiun)  that discussed the oh-so horrible UI, similar to this thread. I just recently got changed again 😉

 

 


EESignature

Message 20 of 44

Anonymous
Not applicable

What a pompous, rude expert.