Fillet is distorting a face

Fillet is distorting a face

vid.kok
Advocate Advocate
1,702 Views
12 Replies
Message 1 of 13

Fillet is distorting a face

vid.kok
Advocate
Advocate

Please someone explain to me how to replicate what I created in SolidWorks in Fusion 360.

 

The model in SolidWorks:

sw1.PNGsw2.PNG

 

The model in Fusion 360:

 

f1.PNGf2.PNG

 

Fusion 360 distorts the upper face on the model so it is no longer round while SolidWorks doesn't do that.

 

I attached the f3d file.

 

0 Likes
1,703 Views
12 Replies
Replies (12)
Message 2 of 13

TheCADWhisperer
Consultant
Consultant

Zip and Attach your *.sldprt file here.

0 Likes
Message 3 of 13

Phil.E
Autodesk
Autodesk

Thanks for posting. This does seem a little strange, thanks for the example.

 

There are two ways:

 

Use a radius less than about 3mm, or greater than 8.06mm

greater than 8.06.png

Or use a variable fillet radius similar to this:

Use variable radius.png

It's not clear why it would distort at any range of values, so this is a good example to show the dev team.

 

Thanks!





Phil Eichmiller
Software Engineer
Quality Assurance
Autodesk, Inc.


0 Likes
Message 4 of 13

vid.kok
Advocate
Advocate

@TheCADWhisperer I attached the .sldprt file.

 

@Phil.E Unfortunately neither of the two options is valid  for me.

 

0 Likes
Message 5 of 13

algor_neil
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Solidworks has options of "keep edge" or "keep surface" for overflow fillets like this, you need keep edge to prevent that face getting distorted. Looks like 360 is using keep surface.

Message 6 of 13

TheCADWhisperer
Consultant
Consultant

How would you manufacture that feature on the SolidWorks part?

Never mind.

 

See Attached file.

Edit: I just realized that I did wayyy too much work (and made a mistake, but I have to get some other work done while you chew on this one...

TheCADWhisperer_0-1598362558399.png

 

Message 7 of 13

chrisplyler
Mentor
Mentor

 

I don't understand the desired geometry.

 

If the angled fillet is uniform, and basically you're cutting the cylinder off further down into the fillet on one side than you are on the other, then of course the cut-off surface is no longer going to be a circle.

 

Also the base of the fillet isn't going to be a circle either, since it's on an angle relative to the cylinder.

 

https://knowledge.autodesk.com/community/screencast/14dd861e-6d79-4534-9f4b-f90a104cef45

Message 8 of 13

Phil.E
Autodesk
Autodesk

Thanks for letting me know.

 

I'm just curious about your design. What fillet value is expected to be used, and is that at a uniform radius? Does this part "fit" inside another part, where precise fillet radius and tolerances are key? Just asking because the differences are in the mm range, so probably not even visible to the naked eye. I don't mean to make excuses for Fusion, rather I'm trying to understand how the fillet is critical. This will help prioritize the issue at hand.





Phil Eichmiller
Software Engineer
Quality Assurance
Autodesk, Inc.


0 Likes
Message 9 of 13

vid.kok
Advocate
Advocate

The part that I attached in the original post was just for a demonstration.

 

Here is the actual part that I am working with:

fillet demo.PNG

The fillet that Fusion 360 creates is just not aesthetically pleasing and I am sad to hear that there is no walkaround except for the @TheCADWhisperer's solution which s very complicated and time consuming.

 

I guess I will have to export the part from Fusion, apply the fillet in SolidWorks and import the part back to fusion. And this sucks because I lose the design history of the part.

 

Part with R3 fillet applied in Fusion:

c2.PNG

Part with R3 fillet applied in SolidWorks with "Keep edge" feature enabled:

c6.PNG

Message 10 of 13

Phil.E
Autodesk
Autodesk

Got it. That's a better example. Thanks!

 

The closest I could get without too much trouble is using a variable radius fillet, this may not be the best solution for many reasons. Just posting to show what is possible today. 

 

variable.png





Phil Eichmiller
Software Engineer
Quality Assurance
Autodesk, Inc.


Message 11 of 13

vid.kok
Advocate
Advocate

The problem with a variable radius fillet is that the part is then not machinable on the whole range with a R3 ball end mill.

 

Can you pass forward a suggestion to implement a "Keep edge" feature?

0 Likes
Message 12 of 13

MRWakefield
Advisor
Advisor

I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure you're not going to be able to machine all of that fillet with an R3 ball end mill 😉 Have you run a machining simulation on it or modelled up a 6mm ball end mill and tried offering it up to the model?

 

Edit:

To confirm my suspicions I opened your model in SW2020 and added a 3mm fillet using the 'Keep edge' option. I then performed a curvature analysis. here's a screenshot:

MRWakefield_0-1598566506401.png

 

You'll see a radius of curvature of 2.2mm is being reported where my cursor was placed.

 

Edit #2:

I also performed a check on one of the fillet faces:

MRWakefield_0-1598567752587.png

As you can see, the min radius on this face is 1.885mm which you won't be able to machine with a 6mm ball end mill.

 

If this answers your question please mark the thread as solved as it can help others find solutions in the future.
Marcus Wakefield


____________________________________________________________________________________
I've created a Windows application (and now Mac as well) for creating custom thread files for Fusion. You can find out about it here. Hope you find it useful.
If you need to know how to offset threads for 3D printing then I've created a guide here which you might find useful.
If you would like to send me a tip for any help I've provided or for any of my software applications you've found useful, you can do this via my Ko-Fi page here.
____________________________________________________________________________________

Message 13 of 13

chrisplyler
Mentor
Mentor

@vid.kok wrote:

The problem with a variable radius fillet is that the part is then not machinable on the whole range with a R3 ball end mill.


 

Yeah...uh...I'm pretty sure the SW part isn't either.