Efficient way of creating this part

Efficient way of creating this part

sutherland-
Collaborator Collaborator
581 Views
8 Replies
Message 1 of 9

Efficient way of creating this part

sutherland-
Collaborator
Collaborator

Hi all,

 

What would be your take on creating the part seen on the screenshot below in the most efficient way?

sutherland_0-1669278720261.png

 

I know that it is possible to pattern the object using a path, but then I must specify the amount of objects that I want along the path, which isn't handy + F360 will start "not responding" after inserting large numbers, for example, if I input 60 objects along the path, it crashes (the PC is powerful, so specs is not the issue of not handling).

sutherland_2-1669279148826.png

 

P.S. Is there a command of automatically filling in the pattern with objects? It can be calculated by measuring the length of the path, for example 150mm, and then measuring the length of the object, for example 1 mm, which would mean that we need 150 objects to fill in the path, but is there a way of automating this?


Please click on Accept Solution so other community members can see how to solve the issue.
Also, consider giving a Like to the comments that you feel helped you.

Best regards,
Level  sutherland-

Member
0 Likes
582 Views
8 Replies
Replies (8)
Message 2 of 9

Bunga777
Mentor
Mentor

I am also quite distressed by all this.

It is clearly lighter when the pattern copy of the component is used.

bunga_1-1669282500587.png

 

Perhaps even 100 or more will work with plenty of room to spare.

 

I made it in a hurry, so the design is quite appropriate, but I have pasted the data.

 

Message 3 of 9

sutherland-
Collaborator
Collaborator

It does get quite frustrating, not gonna lie.

What was your thought behind adding exactly 72 objects within the pattern?


Please click on Accept Solution so other community members can see how to solve the issue.
Also, consider giving a Like to the comments that you feel helped you.

Best regards,
Level  sutherland-

Member
0 Likes
Message 4 of 9

Bunga777
Mentor
Mentor

It is not accurate at all.

I measured the spacing between the holes and copied and pasted, but I just increased the number to fill the space between the paths as I saw fit.

Sorry there is nothing magical about it.

 

Moreover, the holes are not aligned in the curved part, so this pattern copy is not good.

It seems that we have to devise a way to match them well.

0 Likes
Message 5 of 9

sutherland-
Collaborator
Collaborator

That is why it would be great to have a checkmark saying "Fill path" or something similar, so it would automatically fill the path with the object.
I would say that for this feature we would need to specify the distance between the objects, if that is desired. At least in our case where the objects kind of interlocks with the holes.

 

P.S. I noted that if the design history is disabled, the software does not crash.


Please click on Accept Solution so other community members can see how to solve the issue.
Also, consider giving a Like to the comments that you feel helped you.

Best regards,
Level  sutherland-

Member
Message 6 of 9

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

Unfortunately such a function does not exist in the pattern tools in Fusion 360. It would indeed be a very helpful feature 

If you have a model where you can reproduce a crash, please share it and also share the CER number of the crash report.


EESignature

Message 7 of 9

TheCADWhisperer
Consultant
Consultant

@sutherland-

Can you File>Export your *.f3d file to your local drive and then Attach it here to a Reply?

0 Likes
Message 8 of 9

sutherland-
Collaborator
Collaborator

@TheCADWhisperer @TrippyLighting 

Magically, I cannot reproduce the crash anymore, if it pops up any time I will share the CER number.


Please click on Accept Solution so other community members can see how to solve the issue.
Also, consider giving a Like to the comments that you feel helped you.

Best regards,
Level  sutherland-

Member
0 Likes
Message 9 of 9

TheCADWhisperer
Consultant
Consultant

@sutherland- 

Fully define your sketch path.

Do NOT use Symmetry (Mirror) constraints.

Make path Tangent continuous.

 

0 Likes