Hi,
I recently saw a couple of videos on YouTube, one was about the differences in the way people from
the West think about things compared to the East. The basic idea was that western people tend to think
with the object in mind where people from the east tend to think with the subject in mind. An example
is three fish swimming - west, a pond with plants and fish - east. A good practical example compared
various woodworking joins. West used standard mitre joints and lap joints and nailed or glued them
together, but eastern and particularly Japanese woodworking joints are often more complex and
interlocking. These eastern joints also tend not to use metal nails or glue but are pinned with wood. The
reason for this is that historically in Japan there was little metal of any quality and it was scarce so they
had to work out different ways of joining things. These interlocking wooden joints also worked very well
in a region prone to earthquakes and large temperature variations. I would recommend looking up these
joints as I did, the second video, to have a look as it was interesting and made sense in context.
The other people who have posted on this topic are sort of suggesting something similar here to what you
need. I presume that you are using lap joints to join two flat surfaces. This makes sense with this "western"
thinking. I think that you would be better trying an "eastern" solution, in that maybe instead of a flat surface
to glue with simple lap joints, maybe a simple interlocking "step" along the edges would help to make the
joins sit better and make gluing easier as then the parts would slide along but not apart. A two "step" approach
would even prevent sliding, so by glueing the edges, interlocking them and reinforcing the joint with a lap
joint it should sit nicely, not have a lot of movement and ultimately would be stronger.
Certainly worth thinking about. A very minor change along the joining edge would make this problem
much easier for you to solve.
Cheers
Andrew