Hi there,
please I hope I do not come across negative - thats not my intent, I just try to offer some honest and objective opinion which however also only reflects my own needs and workflow.
I think for me the biggest problem is the amount of surfacing tools Fusion 360 only offers compared to Rhino or Alias.
While they all offer for example some extrude loft etc the devil is in the detail and how much those tools offer you different options.
It seems that Fusion 360 in general tries to be more engineering like with the Inventor / Solidworks approach. This methodology seems by itself provide
some advantages (the sketches and sketch constraints) but at the same time being limited by just them as well as they are not as flexible as 3D sketches/curves.
if you look for example at edge rounding commands one can see quickly that Fusion 360 has rather very basic options compared to the highly specialised
Alias tools.
What appreciate in Fusion is how much they try in contrast to Rhino simplify the interface and group surfacing commands together.
As far as I know that was the same issue with Pro-E or SolidWorks when they competed with dedicated surfacing applications and were outperformed by them. With recently SolidWorks got a lot more usable also by surfacing designers and not just engineers with having included much better 3D sketch functions.
However I assume and hope that with time the commands in Fusion 360 will grow in quantity and also in depth.
Claas Kuhnen
Faculty Industrial Design – Wayne State Universit
Chair Interior Design – Wayne State University
Owner studioKuhnen – product : interface : design
