Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
Submitted byAnonymouson03-29-201708:04 AM
Status:
Gathering Support
Patch
I think the Patch environment should be called 'Surface' (since that is essentially what it is) and it would make for less confusion. Let's call it what it is.
I would even go a step further and just remove the patch environment altogether. It's quite common to combine solid and surface modeling, even on single objects. Why does there need to be a separate "environment" for surface commands vs. solid commands? In fact why not just go to a tabbed toolbar like every other modern software?
