Announcements
Visit Fusion 360 Feedback Hub, the great way to connect to our Product, UX, and Research teams. See you there!
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

New tool library still too cumbersome, chip thinning would clean it all up.

New tool library still too cumbersome, chip thinning would clean it all up.

Obviously the new tool library is a work in progress, but it's pretty half baked. It solves no problems, just moves them to a new area. 

 

- What is the point in adding ramp feedrates if one can't choose the angle? Or one can't specify if it's a normal ramp or a helical one? Or the fact that no hole/entry point will be the same, so one ramp diameter will not fit all. This makes it kind of pointless to even include a feed for ramping in the first place.

 

- How about just one feed/speed per material and then let fusion figure out? Otherwise these are my templates for only 3 materials (Haven't even begun slotting or floor finish):

Screen Shot 2020-01-23 at 11.23.32 AM.png

 

Templates should only be for different materials. 

 

1 tool. Feeds and speeds for full slot, wall finish, floor finish, 1 HSM stepover value. That's a minimum of 4 different templates just for one material. What a cluster. There should be one field for finish chip load, one for HSM rough chip load, one for full slotting chip load. Bam. Fixed.

 

- 2 different machines with different max spindle speeds? Time to either double this list, double one's entire tool library, or re edit every spindle speed/feed/lead in/out feed until the end of time for half of every single operation.

 

- Adding the ability to create folders within libraries is pretty basic but would go a long way.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Submit Idea  

Autodesk Design & Make Report