Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
I'm trying to align components in a conceptual design with gaps for future parts. I can place a Joint Origin on Lines, centre lines, solids, faces edges etc etc BUT NOT PLANES < surely this should be possible ????
Although you can pick a face you also have to pick a point on the face, corner, midpoint, centre or other feature. A plane has no fixed size so there are no points to attach to. You can create a sketch on the plane and add a point then select the point for a joint origin but without some sort of geometry to attach to it just isn't going to work.
Coming from solidworks, where there are no such restrictions that's a negative.
The classic example is where you are doing concept design and so have to leave space between bodies/components.
In this situation it would be good to be able to join to any construction geometry eg planes, axes, intersections, points, as well as, sketch entities.
Otherwise loving F360 🙂 .... it (and onshape), must be getting a lot of ex-solidworks people as DS policy/roadmap is totally confusing and also costly as they try to gouge people into having both Solidworks and Catia-lite (aka 3D Xperience, or whatever this months name for it is) ... oh and all these are non-compatible with each other 🙂
