Announcements
Visit Fusion 360 Feedback Hub, the great way to connect to our Product, UX, and Research teams. See you there!
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Hole feature odd behaviour

Hole feature odd behaviour

I feel the hole feature could be improved when making assemblies.

It seems as though the hole will cut through everything regardless of which component is active. Is this really the design intent?

 

Please see image attached.

Fusion360_HoleFeature.jpg

7 Comments
O.Tan
Advisor

You're not alone in this, I have similar issues as well. And FYI it's not only the hole command, even the cut command will affect other components that is supposedly "not active"

 

You can look at my thread here
http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/sketching-sculpting-modeling-and/besides-isolate-hide-any-other-way-to...

Anonymous
Not applicable

This is one of the main reasons I submitted the 'isolate body' idea. It drives me nuts when I can't quickly do a cut due to the surrounding objects.

 

haughec
Alumni

Thanks for the feedback.  A few comments on the design intent:

  • The active component toggle is intended to specify the component to which the feature you are creating will belong.  For example, if you activate a component while creating a sketch, that sketch will be nested beneath the selected component.  This is important if you want to maintain clean and logical assembly structure.
  • Cut operations will cut anything that is visible (and nothing that is invisible), irrespective of activation.  Our goal here was to keep the boolean logic simple - what you see is what you cut.

Design intent aside, this approach has proven a bit confusing for several users.  We'd like to provide some ability to specify the bodies/components that are cut within the feature dialogs.  Would that address your concerns?

 

Thanks,

Charles

 

haughec
Alumni
Status changed to: 実装済み
 
Anonymous
Not applicable

I would like to be able to set which bodies are effected by an operation within it's parameters.  A problem I run into is that I will edit an operation but since a different set of bodies is visible from the when I created the operation I'll effect a change in scope I didn't intend.  If the scope of effect of the operation was a parameter of the operation, it would "remember" what to effect instead of going on what is currently visible every time it's modified.

bverboort
Advocate

An Add/Remove participant control(s) would give us the flexibility to change design intent and make significant design changes without needing to "foresee" components are impacted by which features.

keqingsong
Community Manager
Status changed to: RUG-jp審査通過
 

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Submit Idea