09-27-2019
10:59 AM
- Marcar como nuevo
- Favorito
- Suscribir
- Silenciar
- Suscribirse a un feed RSS
- Resaltar
- Imprimir
- Denunciar
09-27-2019
10:59 AM
@Kent1Cooper wrote:
@Anonymous wrote:
.... THIS PATTERN.....AT A SIZE OF 200X1200X2MM
What's the 1200mm dimension? ....
Try this, using the lower part of my image [overall extent in length = 1200, long edge = 1000], and with the "size" being nominal, i.e. to the center of the 2-unit-wide joints [not the tiles themselves], and with accurate 45-degree-multiple angles for all linesets:
*CHEVRON, Chevron pattern, 200x1200 nominal with 2-wide joints 90, -1,2.41421356, 1414.21356237,1414.21356237, 280.01428535,-2.82842712 90, 1,2.41421356, 1414.21356237,-1414.21356237, 280.01428535,-2.82842712 90, 706.10678119,707.52099475, 1414.21356237,1414.21356237, 280.01428535,-2.82842712 90, 708.10678119,707.52099475, 1414.21356237,-1414.21356237, 280.01428535,-2.82842712 45, 1,2.41421356, 200,200, 997.17157288, -1002.82842712 45, 1,-0.41421356, 200,200, 997.17157288, -1002.82842712 135, -1,2.41421356, 200,-200, 997.17157288, -1002.82842712 135, -1,-0.41421356, 200,-200, 997.17157288, -1002.82842712
But I agree with @hugha -- the joints are so tiny compared to the tile size that there must be only a very limited set of circumstances in which it's worth showing both edges of the joints. If you're showing it at a size such that the joint width is apparent, you probably won't be showing enough of it to really see the pattern.
Kent Cooper, AIA