Anuncios

The Autodesk Community Forums has a new look. Read more about what's changed on the Community Announcements board.

Kent1Cooper
en respuesta a: Kent1Cooper


@Kent1Cooper wrote:

I notice your diagonal dimension and vertical dimension are not the same.  Shouldn't they be?  ....


 

For anyone not wanting the oddified proportions, but wanting a regular  isometric stacked-cubes arrangement, here's one.  The edge of a "cube" is one drawing unit long -- use the Hatch pattern Scale directly to make that whatever size you want.  The origin is at one of the 3-line-end intersections [a closest-to-you virtual "corner" of a cube].

 

*ISOCUBES, Isometric stacked Cubes
30, 0,0, 1.5,.xxx-xxxxxxxx, 2,-1
150, 0,0, 1.5,.xxx-xxxxxxxx, 2,-1
270, 0,0, 1.5,.xxx-xxxxxxxx, 2,-1

[Yes, that's a lot of decimal places, to minimize pattern "drift" as distance from the origin increases -- knock some off if you like.]

EDIT:  Wow -- the "system" is replacing my lots-of-decimal places number with those x's, for some inconceivable reason.  Because it looks like a toll-free telephone number, maybe?  [That's the only reason I can think of for its adding the hyphen where it did.]  That element should be [with spaces added between digits here, because it wouldn't leave it alone outside the code window, either]   . 8 6 6 0 2 5 4 0 3 7 8   in each case.

I'm attaching the .pat file, which supposedly will come through without the Bowdlerizing.

Kent Cooper, AIA