- Marcar como nuevo
- Favorito
- Suscribir
- Silenciar
- Suscribirse a un feed RSS
- Resaltar
- Imprimir
- Denunciar
Draw it in 2D, not 3D.
I would assume the 2D requirement is because the reader(s) or 'audience' cannot work with, or use 3D drawings, especially Lidar which would require a program with more horsepower than plain vanilla Cad.
It would guess your planimetric drawing would have quite a large and varied audience, i.e. county or state permit issuers, federal regulators, neighboring landowners, conservationists, surveyors, the transmission line owners themselves, subcontractors, etc., etc. (I'm sure there's more) and each of them has a responsibility to see that the transmission corridor complies with regulations, does not adversely impact adjacent property owners or the community in general, or communicates the area where construction and installation work is to be performed.
I would think the major drawing components, besides the corridor and overhead transmission lines, would be support tower locations, right-of-way, easements, adjacent parcel lines, land use, land coverage, topography, roads that intersects the corridor, and other public utilities near or within your area's scope of work.
If all you can do with your Lidar data is to draw the corridor, lines, and towers (you can draw, right? and not just assemble and format Lidar data) then draw it in 2D and be done with it. If your drawing requires more info than that, then that's a different issue and should probably be posted separately. Alternatively, you can simply assign the drawing to someone else.
Chicagolooper