02-14-2015
05:35 AM
- Marcar como nuevo
- Favorito
- Suscribir
- Silenciar
- Suscribirse a un feed RSS
- Resaltar
- Imprimir
- Denunciar
02-14-2015
05:35 AM
In the interest of clarity, I, too, believe that an algorithm change between 2014 and 2015 is responsible for the different levels of performance. Some process of that new algorithm, a math calculation, some tolerance setting, suffers a double precision floating point operation mishap. I say that specifically because Flatshot does works better at more sensible unit settings.
With regard to CAD operations, and AutoCAD in particular, the logical ‘bug’ is the notion that millimeters should be used at architectural scale. Sure, it saves the users the hassle of a inputting radix points, but it cause numerous problems as math calculations waste significant digits needlessly.
************************************************************
May your cursor always snap to the location intended.