Anuncios

The Autodesk Community Forums has a new look. Read more about what's changed on the Community Announcements board.

Anonymous
en respuesta a: john.vellek

One thing I learned is turning selection cycling off makes it easier, but all is not good for me.

Eg01.PNG

Above I am picking the top edge of the chamfer, but a bunch of edges get highlighted so it is confusing. These edge highlights remain after the operation and can only be cleared by selecting the object and ESC.

 

With selection cycling off, the selection of a box edge is clear:

Eg03.PNG

But when the chamfer edge on the right is being picked the feedback is just simply wrong (an edge on the box nowhere near the pick point is highlighted):

Eg04.PNG

 

But in fact it appears the correct edge was selected (not again the spurious edge highlighting):

Eg06.PNG

 

The rest of the edges are selected, but in the end, lo and behold, that second edge does not get the fillet:

Eg07.PNG

 

I have repeated this a few times, and missing fillet edge is not always reproducible, but in many cases an edge that shows up filleted in the preview (with an orbit to make sure that all edges are rounded) does not end up in the final accepted result (and maybe it is 2 edges, but so far always it is an edge created by the chamfer).

 

To me is seems clear that operations on a solid with history (say with history view off) should appear to the user exactly like on the same solid without history. If you want to go back and change history, it should take an additional step to access the history. This is exactly how the competing product works, and to me there is no contest at all which is better!