Anuncios

The Autodesk Community Forums has a new look. Read more about what's changed on the Community Announcements board.

Autodesk have been 'supporting' SECTIONPLANE for quite a few years now, and they consider it important enough to give it it's own ribbon.

 

If VIEWBASE is truly superior, then why not discontinue SECTIONPLANE instead of continuing to support something that doesn't actually work?

 

Also, I respectfully disagree that VIEWBASE is better than SECTIONPLANE. Why should I have to load up the entire 3D model just to look at a 2D section or view of it? Sure, it's ok for a small model, but after that it becomes slow and unresponsive.

 

AutoCAD is not a new product. It has been enjoying a lot of support and patronage for decades. Yet each release of AutoCAD feels every bit as 'beta' as the last. New features are added, some of which only half work, and then they are left to languish. Perfect example is SECTIONPLANE.