- Marcar como nuevo
- Favorito
- Suscribir
- Silenciar
- Suscribirse a un feed RSS
- Resaltar
- Imprimir
- Denunciar
@jaskiratspanesar wrote:
To me, it seems like some dimensions are missing to draw arcs.
The opposite is the case: If we assume on the left site all arcs/lines touch tangetially, then one of the dimesnions (e.g. the 50° angle) leads to an overdimensioned/overconstrained geometry.
Attached an example which was drawn using constraints. I "ignored" the 50° angle and got an full constrained geometry.
I you move the inserted image 200 to the right you can compare you image shape with the AutoCAD geometry. To reduce the discrepancies between both I changed the 96 dimension t0 95.
You can play with this file until you get the needed result, as example:
- change the 95 back to the initial 96 (double click at d6 and change the value) and see what happens
- add the 50° angle if you urgently need that value (you must delete one of the tangential constraints before) and see what happens.
- Play with changing other dimensions and or geometrical constraints. We (I) can not know how the shape should look at the end.
Jürgen Palme
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.