Anuncios

The Autodesk Community Forums has a new look. Read more about what's changed on the Community Announcements board.

nrz13
en respuesta a: Yusakuasano

AutoCAD doesn't utilize a lot of graphics performance most of the time.  If you did really heavy graphics-intensive layouts, you might reach the capacity of the MX350, but I doubt most users would.  I know Photoshop has made some gains in using the graphics card for some functions, but I don't think it's enough to make a noticeable difference between the two cards.

AutoCAD is mostly a single-threaded application, so the Intel processor is actually slightly faster for that use case.  You will likely never notice the difference between the two either way.  The Intel also has a slightly lower wattage than the AMD, which means it may be less likely to become thermally constrained in a laptop (but that's also up to the cooling design of each laptop).

A faster SSD will boot faster, load programs faster, save faster (large Photoshop files), and copy files faster.  I have yet to reach a point where I could say "wow, I guess I really don't need a faster SSD now".

If you're not going to do any gaming, then I'd go with the Dell.


Work:  AutoCAD 2022.1.3, Windows 10 Pro v22H2 64-bit, Intel Core i7-8700K, 32GB RAM, Samsung 960 Pro SSD, AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100, 3 Dell Monitors (3840x2160)
Home: AutoCAD 2022.1.3, Windows 10 Pro v22H2 64-bit, Intel Core i7-11700, 64GB RAM, Samsung 980 Pro SSD, NVIDIA Quadro P2200, Dell Monitor (3840x2160)