- Marcar como nuevo
- Favorito
- Suscribir
- Silenciar
- Suscribirse a un feed RSS
- Resaltar
- Imprimir
- Denunciar
I've created a custom hatch pattern of a grid that I can easily scale to match the spacing of the lines and placed in the appropriate "Library" folder. When I try to place the hatch pattern in the drawing, the named pattern does appear in the Hatch Library as a square with a cross through it (apparently not a good sign). When I choose it and a point in the drawing, I get "Error in Pattern mzatile. What would you like to do with this pattern?" I've created custom patterns before (and this was edited version of another), but this one is failing:
;; <- Begin mzatile ->
;; MZA tile elevation
*mzatile, MZA tile
0, 0,0, 0,1
90, 0,0 1,0
;; <-End mzatile ->
;;
Is the file name and pattern name case sensitive? I've tried both ways. What else might I be missing?
¡Resuelto! Ir a solución.
- Marcar como nuevo
- Favorito
- Suscribir
- Silenciar
- Suscribirse a un feed RSS
- Resaltar
- Imprimir
- Denunciar
@mzarchs hi,
first there is a comma missing on the line 90 angle
second i do not know what pattern you are trying to achieve but something is wrong on the line 90 angle
it would draw the second line on the first line so maybe it should be: 90, 0,0, 0,1 ?
and if it should be a 'NET' lines then hatch has a build-in pattern call U (know as USER defined) which is exactly straight lines and you can double hatch the area to get net lines.
moshe
- Marcar como nuevo
- Favorito
- Suscribir
- Silenciar
- Suscribirse a un feed RSS
- Resaltar
- Imprimir
- Denunciar
Hi @mzarchs
This one:
;; <- Begin mzatile -> ;; MZA tile elevation *mzatile, test 0,0,0,0,1 90,0,0,0,1 ;; <-End mzatile -> ;;
worked for me.
Do you find the posts helpful? "LIKE" these posts!
Have your question been answered successfully? Click 'ACCEPT SOLUTION' button.
Maxim Kanaev
Architect
MARSS
Etiquette and Ground Rules of Autodesk Community
- Marcar como nuevo
- Favorito
- Suscribir
- Silenciar
- Suscribirse a un feed RSS
- Resaltar
- Imprimir
- Denunciar
Thanks, that worked for me. The 90 degree and delta-x verses delta-y confused me. Plus the the missing comma was a case of not being able to see the tree for the forest. Thanks again.