- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
when i select 2 holes to chamfer, it cuts one right but make the second one almost double the size. am i doing something wrong or is this a little glitch?
this happens when i use either the chamfer tool path or the contour toolpath with chamfer on.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
This will require some more testing on my (and Autodesk's part) but what happens if you set it to Computer Comp. I did not initially exerience your result, but I was using computer comp. Setting it to Control and I lost the ability to select 2 small holes, but it did fine if each was picked individually.
@paul.clauss we might have an issue here. I had something odd also happen with another part in another thread, but I thought it was a fluke
Seth Madore
Owner, Liberty Machine, Inc.
Good. Fast. Cheap. Pick two.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
Thanks for posting! Would you mind attaching your Fusion 360 design to this thread (or a direct message) so I can attempt to recreate this issue? To do so, please follow any of the techniques at this link. I will then be able to troubleshoot the problem or submit a bug report.
Kind Regards,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
Hi @MJK_Performance,
Thanks for sending the file over! I was able to recreate the behavior you are experiencing and logged a bug report (CAM-6039) with our development team, who will be working to resolve this issue.
In the meantime, I noticed that it did work to create a chamfer operation individually for each hole. This is clearly not an ideal solution, but will need to be used until this issue is fixed by the development team. I would recommend creating a template operation so you will only need to select the contour for each, or modeling the chamfer in the design.
Please let me know if you have any other questions!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
I was able to diagnose the problem by using tool orientation to check if Z was perpendicular to the part face. Turns out the stock face (which was used to define Z in the setup) and the part are off by 0.01646686 degrees. That will mess things up.
I've attached a new version of the design for you to try where I used a face on the part for the Z direction. Seems to work fine.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
i swear, that 0.016 degree gets me everytime!
thanks for fixing that for me, you guys are awesome!
@Anonymous.abraham wrote:I was able to diagnose the problem by using tool orientation to check if Z was perpendicular to the part face. Turns out the stock face (which was used to define Z in the setup) and the part are off by 0.01646686 degrees. That will mess things up.
I've attached a new version of the design for you to try where I used a face on the part for the Z direction. Seems to work fine.
Fusion