Thank you for your post Wymand. The issue we had with 32-bit support was that the 32-bit user base represented < 5% of the total users and really closer to 1%. That meant maintaining a pretty significant development effort & CI/CD / release pipeline for what was in fact a very small number of users, most of whom would benefit from a move to 64-bit a operating system and had the CPU to support it.
That being said, if indeed you're running a i386, then that wouldn't be at all possible as you noted (the 386 was a long way from a 64-bit device, being one of the first of the 32-bit classes of processors targeting desktop computing and replacing the 16-bit processors before it). In fact, I'd be impressed if you could run anything like a modern GUI / application considering it peaked at ~40MHz and wouldn't be able to support graphics frameworks as we do today.
Sorry, but this puts you in a pretty rare class of user (a percentage of a percentage) and though I'd LOVE to be able to say "we support anything and everything" this was a choice I had to make and decided the costs were too high. Sorry about that! I wish I had better news for you.
Best regards,
Matt