
- Marcar como novo
- Favorito
- Inscrever-se
- Emudecer
- Inscrever-se no RSS Feed
- Realçar
- Imprimir
- Relatório
I have attached a screenshot of my problem, and supplementary files if necessary to look at in more detail. This is a student project.
Description: I am working on a rail project with a track spacing of 1.22m, which is different from pretty much every standard out there. So I have fiddled the formulas in Civil 3D to take this into consideration, and tested them on a curve with 325m radius, and I've produced an Excel spreadsheet to double-check the values and tolerances.
The problem: the length of the transition curve in the Excel spreadsheet is 51m. The length of the transition curve in my Civil 3D project is 50m. All the other values are practically identical.
I do not understand the reasons for this disparity. Although it's only a 2% error... it's not really acceptable in rail design. Any suggestions as to what might be the cause for this difference are welcome.
Also... are there any tutorials (video or otherwise) which people here might recommend for learning how to use all of the cant/calculation features in Civil 3D for rail? I've looked and looked, and found very few. I only barely have managed to understand how features such as "Design Criteria" work, or what "Attainment method" actually means, and how the different options are actually different from one another.
Solucionado! Ir para Solução.