Improper surface from corridor

[krzysztof.psujek]

Hi, could someone tell me what is the reason I've got incorrect surface on a part of the corridor.

Is it sth wrong with the alignment (or its profile)?

I create simple profile that going along prepared profile and everytime I've got wrong results in range ~0/780-990.

Thank in advance for every clue.

Look at the picture:

the red one is example profile that is used in the corridor and the surface I've create follow with it in way I want to, but on one part it going up near to 0 elevation.

Chris

[Joe-Bouza]

Your file has nothing in it but layout tabs. The prospector shows no alignment, profile, corridor or surfaces

[krzysztof.psujek]

OK, I've reattached it in the original post.

Thanks

[Joe-Bouza]

Your profile start and end station need to be extend or the corridor limit shortend that is why the two ends go to zero.

If you change the corridor surface to be built from DATUM instead of P1 you wil get a match. I can't explain why P1 gives a spike in the middle but DATUM works

[krzysztof.psujek]

---

Your profile start and end station need to be extend or the corridor limit shortend that is why the two ends go to zero.

---

Yup, I know, it was a quick prepared to show what is a problem.

---

If you change the corridor surface to be built from DATUM instead of P1 you wil get a match. I can't explain why P1 gives a spike in the middle but DATUM works

---

In such way I prepared a series of surfaces that I needed and there was not a problem with any of them.

Problems appeared only here with this alignment/profile and also have no idea what it comes from.

Previously I've tested a few options to built the surface and added points with code P1 (as here i the example) gave me the best results.

As I remember If I used link codes  the profile of created surface in some places are not covered with the profile set as target.

Will test again it and share with you the result.

But have to do it with my original profile not this simple prepared for test.

Anyway thanks.

Chris

[krzysztof.psujek]

I was right. The results from link code DATUM not satisfy me.

Is there another method to get - similar effect maybe using other subassemblies?

I want that my surface profile will follow with the target profile.

Here's the file.

Here I have a differences.

Chris