I agree with your statment - i have a negative view of Civil3d,
as the industry cad standard, used world wide .
it shoud be failsafe. and yes that is a LOT to ask from a computer program,
considering the different computer systems, components, users, training, and manuals
being very fair, i wrote so many "how to's" for LDD at two engineering companiesm
and had a non-cad user proof them and then test them.
takes a while to get it right - but the end result is GOLDEN.
civil3d should be so much better,
and not need a billion styles to make it look right.
LDD and autocad were useable right out of the box,
you really cannot do that with Civil3D, everything has to be setup and
so much is not clearly documented. WHY?
manuals that are printed, so you can read the manual and learn. . . . .
this is getting very long. and i am very tired of hearing about styles.
too may companies throw us under the bus and then wonder why production dies.
so, i have to adapt and keep learning on my time. ,.. . . . ..
civil3d was ment to be so much better than LDD, really?
dynamic is ok, but you have to assign the work to the person who understands how to make the program work correctly.
otherwise, you have trash and more problems than solutions.
train empolyees or wish you had; the owners never understand that.
thank you, Jay for correcting my poor attitude.
nonbeard13
Charles A. Hall, E.I.T.
Civil Designer
CARLSON, BRIGANCE, & DOERING INC.
CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING
AUSTIN, TX 78749