The drawing titled contours.dwg is not good. Were the contours.dwg made from the PDF version of the survey? If it was, upload that PDF so all notes, footnotes, abbreviations, symbols, explanations, etc, etc, etc. can be evaluated.
I'm guessing 'not in a format that can be imported' is the reason why the contours.dwg is the way it is. In terms of importing the survey drawing, don't import it. You'd be better off re-creating it. You don't need to re-create every single dot, line, arc, polygon, tick mark, crow's foot, benchmark, etc. just re-create, or copy, the relevant parts of the survey that will produce a SURFACE. Why? Because topographic contours are representations of surface topography. Create the existing ground, or EG, and the contours will be automatic.
You could also get the surface by using spot elevations, but doing it this way requires third party software such as Surfer, from Golden Software. You could also get contours (as others are about to suggest) using Map3D, but Map's contour generation algorithm produces lousy and jagged contours, not the spline-like contours you are probably expecting.
You could, but can't, produce a surface from the angled numbers that are supposed to be spot elevations. Two reasons why you can't:
- The numbers are not text, they's polylines formed into the shape of numbers. This likely the result of exporting the PDF survey to vectors, such as AutoCad line work.
- Those numbers don't accurately reference a specific spot 'where' the elevation occurs. The specific spot should be identifiable by coordinates, e.g., Lat/Long, Northing/Easting, X/Y, etc. and represented by a symbol such as an 'X'. They shouldn't point to a general area next to an elevation.
The PDF version of your survey holds the key. Can you upload it?
Chicagolooper
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/495e6/495e633166c1c37ea66ebc77cb2908f6e8dd1f02" alt="EESignature EESignature"