@swilliamsDPY2U wrote:
...
A,.25,-.125,0,[">",STANDARD,S=.1,R=0.0,X=-0.0,Y=-.035],-.125,0,-.125,0,-.125,-.125,0,-.125
You have a dot right where the text character should go in, in a way that isn't in your image. And you have two pen-up entries in a row that just make for a double-length gap. You want to backset the text character with a negative X value, to get its arrowhead "point" at the end of that first pen-down segment.
Assuming the Arial Truetype font that is currently the default font assigned to the Standard Style, I adjusted those and tweaked the size & offset values to look a little more like your image, and got this:
A,.25,[">",STANDARD,S=.2,R=0,X=-.135,Y=-.097],-.125,.25,-.125,0,-.125,0,-.125,0,-.125
which looks like this when drawn from left to right:

BUT a lot of older linetypes, perhaps including whatever one you may have used as a starting point to edit if that's what you did, are from the days when the default font assigned to the Standard Style was TXT.shx. I think that makes a better look for this kind of thing, but it requires you to either assign TXT to that Style or, if you want Standard to use Arial for other usages, define a Style that uses TXT and call for that in the linetype definition. It also needs tweaks to the position/scale parts of the definition:
A,.25,[">",LtypeTXT,S=.2,R=0,X=-.1,Y=-.1],-.125,.25,-.125,0,-.125,0,-.125,0,-.125

If you have a Style defined specifically for text elements in linetype definitions, such as the LtypeTXT Style I made for this [to which I assigned TXT.shx for the font], then yes, you need to send that to others to use the linetype, but it has advantages:
1) The appearance of the linetype will not be made incorrect by someone's having a different font assigned to the Standard Style [it could be anything] than you had in mind for the linetype definition; and
2) If you use any .shx font of single-stroke characters [TXT, ROMANS, SIMPLEX], rather than a Truetype font, the lineweight of the arrowhead arms will always match that of the linework's dashes. With a Truetype font such as Arial, the "look" of the > character will always be the same [relative to its size], no matter what you do with the lineweight of the linework or the plotting weight of the color used. If you go for emphasis [and for the dots to show well] with a heavier lineweight, the > characters may look too wimpy, or if you want a light lineweight, they may look too heavy [as they do in my first image] -- they will not go along with what you choose for the dash/dot parts.
Kent Cooper, AIA