- Marcar como nuevo
- Favorito
- Suscribir
- Silenciar
- Suscribirse a un feed RSS
- Resaltar
- Imprimir
- Denunciar
The Autodesk Community Forums has a new look. Read more about what's changed on the Community Announcements board.
Id try tracing it.
Id recommend trying to get a better picture. My guess is that's not an option as this looks like it was taken from an Instagram post.
Using the image you need to transform the picture so that it can be traced. I used gimp here to do that.
Once I have the image 'squared' up. Ill brin it into AutoCAD to trace.
When tracing I like to use a high contrast color for my line work
Tracing this image will not give an exact copy since the image has been transformed. Its recommended that the trace just be used to create an accounting of the shapes present and then line them up correctly.
Once you have the items traced you can use the surface tool to create surfaces of everything, then you can extrude the items. once you have 3D solids you can use the subtract tool to create your 3D Model.
CADnoob
@TheCADnoob wrote:
.... Once you have the items traced you can use the surface tool to create surfaces of everything, then you can extrude the items. once you have 3D solids you can use the subtract tool to create your 3D Model. ....
Easier than that: Once you have it traced, assuming the perimeter and all the internal triangles/quadrilaterals are closed shapes, PRESSPULL will make the whole 3D Solid with all the holes in it, all at once. No need for Extrusions of a lot of pieces and then Subtracting those from an overall Solid.
i tried to draw it but i feel it wrong i think it can better than this
Looks like the shapes are all aligned with one another on some kind of grid.
Start by drawing straight grid lines vertically and horizontally.
Every angle you make looks like it should be 45°
In your example you created each shape individually, which is why it looks off.
can you help me with this ?
@Brock_Olly wrote:
....
Every angle you make looks like it should be 45°
.....
They are clearly not all at orthogonal and/or 45°-multiple angles in the original image, or these would all be parallel:
I think it should look "off," because what it's an image of is "off."
so it should look like what i draw ?
@ebram_shenouda wrote:
so it should look like what i draw ?
If you traced it accurately, why not? [I did not analyze your drawing in comparison to the image in detail, not having something to rectify the image as a basis.]
By the way, don't use the "Reply to the topic..." slot under the last Message. Anything entered there shows as being in Reply to Message 1 and its author [in this case, yourself], so it's not clear to whom you're Replying, or sometimes about what [unless you include a quotation]. Instead, always use the REPLY box at lower right within the Message you're Replying to.
ok bro thank you and can i get help in the drawing ?
to me it looks like you have the ability to do what you need. It may still require clean up, but you are just about there. Im not sure what you need help with.
If you are looking for someone to do the work for you, you can check out the services marketplace and see if you can hire someone there.
https://www.autodesk.com/support/partners
CADnoob