@Anonymous wrote:
Thank you for your response.
Could you please share the shape and the line type, i could give it a try.
Here are the Shape definitions:
*138,2,JOINT
084,0
*139,12,BRICK2
9,(0,61),(29,0),(0,-61),(-29,0),(0,0),0
*140,16,BRICK3
9,(0,100),(0,83),(55,0),(0,-100),(0,-83),(-55,0),(0,0),0
and here are the linetype definitions:
*BRKEDG2C
A,0,[JOINT,sashp.shx,Y=-4],-4
*BRKEDG3C
A,0,[JOINT,sashp.shx,Y=-4],-2.666666
*BRKEDG2E
A,0,[JOINT,sashp.shx],-4
*BRKEDG3E
A,0,[JOINT,sashp.shx],-2.666666
*BRKEDG2C_2
A,0,[BRICK2,sashp.shx,S=.125,Y=-3.8125],-4
*BRKEDG3C_2
A,0,[BRICK3,sashp.shx,S=.041666,Y=-3.8125],-2.666666
*BRKEDG2E_2
A,0,[BRICK2,sashp.shx,S=.125,X=-1.8125],-4
*BRKEDG3E_2
A,0,[BRICK3,sashp.shx,S=.041666,X=-1.145833],-2.666666
The ones without a _2 at the end use just single-line shapes, for smaller scales where you don't want both sides of the mortar joints, or for mortarless dry-laid full-size bricks, for which the edges would be in Line or Arc or Polyline form. Those with _2 at the end use Shapes that are full outlines of bricks, so that both sides of joints show, for larger scales.
It's all about standard-modular-size bricks that are 8" long, 4" wide, and three-courses-per-8" thick. Those with EDG2 in their names are for 2 courses per 8" [seeing the 4" nominal side], and those with EDG3 for 3 courses [seeing the 2-2/3" side].
The ones with C after the number are Centered on the "path" of the object they're applied to; those with E after the number have the path along an Edge.
To illustrate something of what @dbroad was talking about, here's the exaggerated effect of large-radius vs. too-tight curvature, using the BRKEDGE3C_2 linetype, though from your example that's probably not an issue:

Making them run in the other direction would be a matter of adding Rotation specifiers to the Shape inclusions, and changing the pen-up specifiers at the ends for different spacing [presumably all to -8].
Kent Cooper, AIA