@Kent1Cooper wrote:
I notice your diagonal dimension and vertical dimension are not the same. Shouldn't they be? ....
For anyone not wanting the oddified proportions, but wanting a regular isometric stacked-cubes arrangement, here's one. The edge of a "cube" is one drawing unit long -- use the Hatch pattern Scale directly to make that whatever size you want. The origin is at one of the 3-line-end intersections [a closest-to-you virtual "corner" of a cube].
*ISOCUBES, Isometric stacked Cubes
30, 0,0, 1.5,.xxx-xxxxxxxx, 2,-1
150, 0,0, 1.5,.xxx-xxxxxxxx, 2,-1
270, 0,0, 1.5,.xxx-xxxxxxxx, 2,-1
[Yes, that's a lot of decimal places, to minimize pattern "drift" as distance from the origin increases -- knock some off if you like.]
EDIT: Wow -- the "system" is replacing my lots-of-decimal places number with those x's, for some inconceivable reason. Because it looks like a toll-free telephone number, maybe? [That's the only reason I can think of for its adding the hyphen where it did.] That element should be [with spaces added between digits here, because it wouldn't leave it alone outside the code window, either] . 8 6 6 0 2 5 4 0 3 7 8 in each case.
I'm attaching the .pat file, which supposedly will come through without the Bowdlerizing.
Kent Cooper, AIA