Combining Surfaces

[Anonymous]

Hello,

I have a solid terrain created by contours. The top surface of solid is collection +500 small surfaces. I do need to combine all top surfaces and make them as one surface to be able to create a mesh in another pre-processor for meshing procedure. Can anyone help me out please?. The file is attached in case you wanna look at it. Thank you.

Regards,

Muhsin 

[Alfred.NESWADBA]

Hi,

one possible workflow:

• delete the 3D-Faces, so only the 3D-Solid remains.
• you can now use command _CONVTOSURFACE

• another option is command _CONVTOSURFACE, but that creates many objects (area-by-area) which then need to be joined using command _UNION.

HTH, - alfred -

[SEANT61]

This may or may not help.  The solid was sliced via lofted surface, and may not work well with downstream processing either.

[Anonymous]

Dear @Alfred.NESWADBA,

I have converted the solid to surfaces using _CONVTOSURFACE. Because the top surface of solid had many small surfaces, I exploded top surface and tried combine them. Unfortunately, I failed. How can I union the exploded surfaces ?  the file is attached.Thank you.

Muhsin 

[Alfred.NESWADBA]

Hi,

>> Unfortunately, I failed

Which message did you receive from AutoCAD, by default it shows you one or more reasons about what happened.

- alfred -

[Anonymous]

I was using Union function, assuming it may work for surfaces. It took around 10 min to recover itself. but nothing happened to top surfaces.

[Alfred.NESWADBA]

Hi,

>> I was using Union function, assuming it may work for surfaces

Yep, it works for surfaces, but not for (none coplanar) region objects. And your second drawing only contains regions, no surfaces.

So I guess _EXPLODE is not an options.

And I'm quite sure you have got a message back from AutoCAD:

- alfred -

[Anonymous]

Yes, I had that warning in the prompt. So, I have no idea how to merge those surfaces. What would u suggest me in that case ?

Thank you.

Muhsin

[Alfred.NESWADBA]

Hi,

>> What would u suggest me in that case ?

At least not using _EXPLODE.

Or when you want to start with the region objects you can use command _MESHOPTIONS to convert the regions to meshes, then run command _UNION and convert the meshes to surfaces.

But it's hard to say what would be the best for your workflow as I don't know your goal (and have not understood it from the other thread where I created that solid).

- alfred -

[Alfred.NESWADBA]

Hi,

please find attached the result of the alternative workflow mentioned in my previous post.

- alfred -

[Anonymous]

Dear @Alfred.NESWADBA,

My goal is to having  a solid that has one single surface at the top and 5 at the sides and bottom. I am going to transfer that solid to FEM software. In this case I cannot work with this solid because small small surfaces causes problem with meshing process in FEM software. Sorry for misunderstanding. Unfortunately, The surface you created in the last attach is still having small surfaces at the top.  Thank you 

Muhsin

[Alfred.NESWADBA]

Hi,

>> My goal is to having  a solid that has one single surface at the top and 5 at the sides and bottom.

Well, your first drawing in your post has such a 3D-Solid.

>> In this case I cannot work with this solid because small small surfaces causes problem

>> with meshing process in FEM software

So you need to reduce the quality from the triangulated 3D-Solid ... but this triangulation was based on your contour lines.

So the way to go is back to Civil 3D, create a surface based on your contour lines, then reduce the quality (which tolerances are given for that process?)

After that recreate the 3D-Solid from the Civil 3D surface.

- alfred -

[Anonymous]

I need that topography to place the structure on.  I have used 80x80 spacing for the current file to from the surface. Wouldn't reducing the quality give the collection of triangular surfaces again? Thank you.

Muhsin

[Alfred.NESWADBA]

Hi,

>> Wouldn't reducing the quality give the collection of triangular surfaces again?

Working with Civil 3D always generates surfaces based on triangles.

Does your FEM-software only work with rectangle based faces?

Is the limitation the size of the triangles or the number of the triangles?

At least reducing the number of geometry will reduce the quality (as long as you don't have neighbored faces with the same slope ... they can be combined to one face without losing quality)

- alfred -

[Anonymous]

I am going to try to reduce the quality. But can you please tell me how I do combine the top surfaces to one surface? That's the killing part I guess. Thanks

Muhsin

[SEANT61]

What happens when you try to use the solid that I attached in Post #3 of this thread?

[Anonymous]

Deat @SEANT61;

I am so sorry I just realised you have attached a file to this thread. I looked at it now and I could successfully transfer the solid to FEM software with single a single top surface. I appreciate it. Can you please explain a little bit more what you have done to the solid ?  Thank you.

Muhsin 

[SEANT61]

I’m working on an AutoCAD add-in that processes contours at elevation into a rectangular lofted surface.  I used that surface to Slice a solid to produce the solid you see in that file.

[Anonymous]

Dear @SEANT61,

I am sorry but I am having difficulty to understand what you have done. It might because I am not a native speaker. Can you please rephrase the steps you have done? I spent lots of time to solve this problem but couldn't. Thank you.

Muhsin

[SEANT61]

Similar to the process that creates a surface with Civil 3D, I'm using a command that is not native to AutoCAD.  The command analyzes contours and recreates the surface via a rectangular lofted surface.  The attached is the intermediate step, before using the surface to slice a solid as I did in my first attachment.