Doug McAlexander
Design Engineer/Consultant/Instructor/Mentor
Specializing in AutoCAD Electrical Implementation Support
Phone: (770) 841-8009
www.linkedin.com/in/doug-mcalexander-1a77623
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
I have the same strait line problem, and cannot believe the answer.
Now we know how to do the thing that we want to avoid.
Doug McAlexander
Design Engineer/Consultant/Instructor/Mentor
Specializing in AutoCAD Electrical Implementation Support
Phone: (770) 841-8009
www.linkedin.com/in/doug-mcalexander-1a77623
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<dougmcalexander> wrote in messageI'm
href="news:6118722@discussion.autodesk.com">news:6118722@discussion.autodesk.com...
not sure what you are referring to. A straight line problem? What is it that
you want to avoid? I have used the competitors and I find AutoCAD Electrical
to be very strong and flexible with regard to managing wires. You are not
limited to using snap, but you can if you wish. I do. You can use either dots
or angles or both as desired. You can replace dots anytime you wish. You can
connect two wires to the same connection point, just like the real world. You
can use regular AutoCAD line commands to run your wires or you can use the
AutoCAD Electrical smart tools. People at Autodesk can tell you that I don't
give them a free pass. I voice concern where I see an issue, but managing
wires with AutoCAD Electrical has not been an area I would consider as a
weakness.
Please, give stretch wire command all the functionality of the ACAD Extend command:
-selection of wire(s) you want to stretch your wire to
-fence selection of wires you want to extend
-SHIFT-select for trimming.
ACADE is great, but I think you are going to fast. You think much more about new features (like circuit builder - which is great) than about some basic issues like:
- after running RETAG some child components that are not in the same drawing with parent are not retagged,
- There is no Project-wide renumbering of multiple (or all) terminal strips
- dialog boxes should be more flexible; sorting by clicking header, customization of column width
- X-Y coordinates in export to spreadsheet
- In IEC mode, if you insert child for the parent that is in another drawing by using project button in Insert/Edit child component, there is no "-" at the beginning; the same happens if you export and update from spreadsheet,
- Merging in cross-ref tables doesn't work properly; if second contact in table is FORM-C, and first one is e.g. NO, than cells in 2nd and 3rd row should be merged, not 1st and 2nd.
Please, read this:
http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/11/28/how-well-cooked-is-the-average-major-new-autocad-feature-t...
Doug McAlexander
Design Engineer/Consultant/Instructor/Mentor
Specializing in AutoCAD Electrical Implementation Support
Phone: (770) 841-8009
www.linkedin.com/in/doug-mcalexander-1a77623
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<vladop> wrote in message
href="news:6118745@discussion.autodesk.com">news:6118745@discussion.autodesk.com...
Please, give stretch wire command all the functionality of the ACAD
Extend command:
-selection of wire(s) you want to stretch your wire
to
-fence selection of wires you want to extend
-SHIFT-select
for trimming.
ACADE is great, but I think you are going to
fast. You think much more about new features (like circuit builder - which is
great) than about some basic issues like:
- after running RETAG some
child components that are not in the same drawing with parent are not
retagged,
- There is no Project-wide renumbering of multiple (or all)
terminal strips
- dialog boxes should be more flexible; sorting by
clicking header, customization of column width
- X-Y coordinates in
export to spreadsheet
- In IEC mode, if you insert child for the parent
that is in another drawing by using project button in Insert/Edit child
component, there is no "-" at the beginning; the same happens if you export
and update from spreadsheet,
- Merging in cross-ref tables doesn't work
properly; if second contact in table is FORM-C, and first one is e.g. NO, than
cells in 2nd and 3rd row should be
merged, not 1st and 2nd.
Please, read
this:
href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/11/28/how-well-cooked-is-the-average-major-new-autocad-...
Doug McAlexander
Design Engineer/Consultant/Instructor/Mentor
Specializing in AutoCAD Electrical Implementation Support
Phone: (770) 841-8009
www.linkedin.com/in/doug-mcalexander-1a77623
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
AAArgh! Did you guys ever find a fix for this?
I select the connection I want to start from then as I pull away from the connector, the wire snaps about the screen at odd angles and extends a big angled loop outside the borders of the drawing before returning at another equally odd angle. At this point even tiny movements from the mouse send the wire flipping wildly all across the page mainly at 45 degree angles, then when you finally get it to the destination terminal, and click to place... it attaches itself to a totally different terminal, additionally deleting portions of nearby adjacent wires as some sort of special demonic bonus!?
It wasn't always like this, it suddenly switched on and now affects all my ACADE drawings, I can use the workaround of putting in a line then moving it to the correct layer manually but all the functionality of automatic numbering etc is lost because of this.
The error here, and most times when people have problems with wire behavior, lies in the expectations of the user. It seems like you're thinking that you only have to click twice, once at each endpoint of the wire, and ACADE will do the rest. Unfortunately, that's only true up to a small and very limited point.
You should manually click to add bends in the wire, so that when you approach the symbol with the wire tool it's already in line with the symbol. This greatly helps the software make the connections automatically.
In your video, it's hard to tell, but it looks like you hit the 'X' key to see your wire connection points but when you clicked the mouse to accept the wire, it was closer to the left one. Remember that the wire will try to terminate on the connection point closest to where you clicked. If you're using grid snaps, this can throw things off, so I'd check those too.
And also, if you elect to draw wires using the line command, you won't lose any sort of functionality at all -- you'll just not be drawing wires with the wire tool. To do that successfully, all you have to do is have a wire layer current, use the LINE command, and draw your wire. Anything that is: 1) a line entity, and 2) on a wire layer, is a wire. You don't need to use the wire tool at all, so long as you remember to NOT use polylines or arcs, and so long as you're drawing on an actual wire layer. Any wires you draw this way will still be addressed by automatic wire number tools, updates, etc.
Check your dwg scale & unit settings...
Some of the times ACADE does this, the units or scale are set wrong.
Type Units and make sure the dwg is using the correct setting for measurement.
Then check your project & dwg properties to see if everything is set right there.
Regards Brad
Brad Coleman, Electrical Draftsman
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
Hi Jim, thank you for the help.
I agree that's how it should work and indeed it did up to about a month ago, then it suddenly changed to this frustrating behaviour.
I also apologise for the terrible video, I don't have admin-rights to install SCREENCAST.
I can no longer put bends in the wire manually, when I click to place a bend it stops the wire all together and disappears.
The SNAP to GRID is turned off, and I've tried various combinations of OSNAP preferences from minimal to everything on, nothing makes much of a difference to this weird behaviour.
If you look closely towards the end of my terrible video, when I clicked to terminate the wire to the STOP pushbutton, it actually attaches itself to the START pushbutton, deleting portions of the wire 23 that was already in place there.
With regards to the wire numbering it simply won't number any of the lines I put in manually, even when they are drawn in directly onto the WIRES layer itself.
I use the "Edit Wire Number" tool and select one of the lines I drew manually, it brings up the attributes box, I enter the wire number and then it amends the number... of a completely different wire (that already had a number assigned) but does nothing to the line I had selected.
I handed my laptop over to a more experienced ACADE user on site with me and he couldn't explain what was going on.
Thanks also Brad, on your advice I have checked the units in the drawing and the units in the project settings, & both are set to Millimetres (as I'm in UK).
First: Keep in mind that it's not just the layer the wire is on, but whether or not that layer is listed as a Wire Type, along with what type of entity makes up the wire. Only a LINE can be a wire. Not a polyline, arc segment, etc. This means that if you are manually drawing wire crossing arcs, ACADE won't be able to recognize anything on the other side of the arc as being the same wire. (When ACADE inserts those wire crossing arcs, it writes some data into the drawing's DB so that it knows where the wire ended/starts back up. Wire data can't carry across the arc because arcs aren't lines.)
Next: When you try to add a number to an invalid wire using the automatic wire number command, there should be a return on the command line that says something along the lines of 'entities found: 0'. If you click on a wire, and no wire number appears, AND you see that phrase on the command line, then there is something about that line that is making it not be recognized as a wire by the software. Make sure the layer that it's on is a valid Wire Type (verify using the Create/Edit Wire Type tool), and make sure it's not a polyline.
On your specific example of editing a wire only to see a different wire's number get changed, this may be due to a component symbol. If the symbol is set up to not have the wire number change as it passes through the component, then this can happen. Can you post a drawing where this is happening?
Moving on, I can't duplicate any of this wire tool behavior at all, no matter which settings I mess with. This implies to me that perhaps you just have something wrong with your installation of the software. I think you should do the following, checking in between each step to see if anything has changed:
1. try a Reset to Defaults...this is usually found in the start menu
2. perform a Repair on your ACADE installation....go through the motions as if you're going to uninstall, and this option pops up along the way
3. perform a reinstall
Remember to back up any customization files you have, in case you have to reinstall.
I agree with @jseefdrumr . If it takes longer than 1 hour to fix, I normally reinstall the AutoCADE as I don't have to spend more than 1 hour. Pl backup your settings first
Another thing I have come across that can cause the problems with the wires going odd angles is a stub or zero length wire on the component.
Run the drawing audit and see if it picks up any wires like that.
Also, you said you checked the scales and units of the dwg, but what about the Feature Scale Multiplier.
This should always be set to 1 or between .25 of either side of it.
This is used to slightly adjust things when inserting and such. If you need to scale the blocks, do so at the Insert Component menu.
Regards Brad
Brad Coleman, Electrical Draftsman
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.