Weeding and Supplementing Factors with Survey Figures Building a Surface

Weeding and Supplementing Factors with Survey Figures Building a Surface

Anonymous
Not applicable
3,736 Views
21 Replies
Message 1 of 22

Weeding and Supplementing Factors with Survey Figures Building a Surface

Anonymous
Not applicable

Good afternnon.

 

I am trying to find the place where I can toggle off the derived points that Civil 3D 2017 adds additional points while builinding a surface. The points are in red in the photo below. The olny points I want to build or create a surface with are the Survey Points.

 

Is there a way to Weed and/or set the Supplementing Factor with Survey Figures? I have looked everywhere for the setting and check with a number of our Civil Engineers at our firm. There is a way to do with a proposed surface with polyline breaklines, but I havn't found where to set it for Survey Figures that we use for breaklines. 

 

Thank you fro any help.

 

David Horsburgh

817-338-1277

Fort Worth, Texas

www.bhbinc.com

 

I will be glad to send our prototype dwg and databases

 

 

0 Likes
3,737 Views
21 Replies
Replies (21)
Message 2 of 22

Jeff_M
Consultant
Consultant
Hi, it appears only the curves are being supplemented. This is controlled by the Mid-ordinate distance setting, the smaller the setting, the 'tighter' the supplemental points will be.

Oh, and Welcome to the forums!
Jeff_M, also a frequent Swamper
EESignature
Message 3 of 22

BrianHailey
Mentor
Mentor

HERE is some information on the mid-ordinate distance and how it works.

 

As an alternative, don't use curves in your survey if you don't want them to be used in the surface. You probably still want them to be used for the plan view (the curves) so you could import the points once and have it create the curves and then, using a different linework codeset, import them again so there aren't curves. Use these new figures in your surface.

Brian J. Hailey, P.E.



GEI Consultants
My Civil 3D Blog

0 Likes
Message 4 of 22

Anonymous
Not applicable

Thank you for your responses. 

 

I have walked through all my Command Settings and altered the midordinate distances and yet I still getting the result. It's a bit frustrating. I will shoot my process through screen cast and upload a video.

 

David

0 Likes
Message 5 of 22

Anonymous
Not applicable

Here is a screen cast I placed on YouTube of my process. Be sure on YouTube to change your settings to HD.

 

https://youtu.be/3AwFkVVG-Ig

 

I have tried a number of senarios of the process and I still get the derived points in red along the Survey Figure curves. I don't mind them on the Survey Points.

 

Thank you for your assitance. 

 

David Horsburgh

www.bhbinc.com

817-388-1277

0 Likes
Message 6 of 22

BrianHailey
Mentor
Mentor

Can you share a drawing with a few of the figures in it? I would like to test it out myself. It definitely doesn't look like it's honoring the settings.

Brian J. Hailey, P.E.



GEI Consultants
My Civil 3D Blog

0 Likes
Message 7 of 22

Anonymous
Not applicable

Here is the dwg in C3D 2017.

 

The attachment portion won't let me attach the database files. 

 

I can email the data if you send me a valid address. 

 

Thank you,

David Horsburgh

0 Likes
Message 8 of 22

rl_jackson
Mentor
Mentor
You need to make the mid-ordinate distance less than 1 not greater. It's like a percentage. Change it to something like 0.2 and see what happens.

Rick Jackson
Survey CAD Technician VI

Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

0 Likes
Message 9 of 22

Jeff_M
Consultant
Consultant
David, ZIP up the db files, then you can post them here.
Jeff_M, also a frequent Swamper
EESignature
0 Likes
Message 10 of 22

Jeff_M
Consultant
Consultant

@rl_jackson, the OP is trying to get rid of the intermediate points on curves, not add to them. And it not a percentage. the mid-ordinate is the distance from a point on the arc to the midpoint of a chord drawn between two points on the curve. So the smaller the mmid-ordinate distance, the shorter that chord which yields more points.

Jeff_M, also a frequent Swamper
EESignature
0 Likes
Message 11 of 22

rl_jackson
Mentor
Mentor
My bad, never heard of doing that though. Usually its the other way around, and based on the points in the drawing, I would guess that those are the shots that make up the curves since it's has multiple compound curves going on. which would not get removed by the mid-ordinate factor.

Rick Jackson
Survey CAD Technician VI

Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

0 Likes
Message 12 of 22

Jeff_M
Consultant
Consultant
Yeah, not sure why he doesn't want those points added. If those shots are marking curbs, I sure wouldn't want my TIN lines & contours crossing over the curb lines.
Jeff_M, also a frequent Swamper
EESignature
0 Likes
Message 13 of 22

rl_jackson
Mentor
Mentor

After watching the video several times, there doesn't see to be enough in the drawing to construct the surface.

 

Questions:

 

Did the field crew shot pavement points between the islands if not you'll most likely need them as it is sloping from one island to the other.

 

Is the curb standard 6" Verticle Curb, if so your missing a line for the vertical face (you only have two breaklines, there should be 3 in the case of vertical curb, I usually handle all curb by shooting either the flow line or back of curb and then using Horizontial and Vertical offsets in the figure codes to handle the breaks.

 

Your point group is including the curb shots correct. If so you should not be doing this, this may be causing it to ignore the breaklines entirely. For a site like you have the only shots that should be in a suface group are the ones that are not a breakline. i.e. pavement and ground shots, and maybe a few others.

 

 


Rick Jackson
Survey CAD Technician VI

Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

0 Likes
Message 14 of 22

Anonymous
Not applicable

Here is the drawing.

 

If you know what you are doing you should be able to help.

 

Thank you,

David Horsburgh

BHB  

0 Likes
Message 15 of 22

rl_jackson
Mentor
Mentor
Unfortunately I don't have version 17 installed.

If your group contains the curb points, don't include them in the group

Rick Jackson
Survey CAD Technician VI

Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

0 Likes
Message 16 of 22

Jeff_M
Consultant
Consultant
As we've noted previously, it appears that the mid-ordinate distance for survey figures is hard coded into C3D. If you truly do not want the added interpolated points along the arcs, you can edit the surface & Delete the points you don't want...just be sure the Surface Style has Points set to display. Depending on how many of these you don't want to be used, it may take a little bit of time but at least you will get what you were looking for.
Jeff_M, also a frequent Swamper
EESignature
0 Likes
Message 17 of 22

Jeff_M
Consultant
Consultant

Here's a screenshot of a small area that I've removed the supplemental points from. Took about 2 minutes for this section.

 

6-2-2016 11-30-33 AM.png

Jeff_M, also a frequent Swamper
EESignature
Message 18 of 22

Anonymous
Not applicable

Thank you for your time and analysis. For now I will do the manual editing of deleting the derived points. However, Autodesk is a big company with lots of resources and this should be an option. Time is money and this oversight costs $$$ and to most who don't realize it's an issue but trust that the software is always right, beware. I've learned in my 30 years of Land Surveying to always, always check how the software processes and generates an electronic survey map. A software for Land Surveying should be developed by Land Surveyors and hopefully this is the case with Autodesk. We've used C3D for three years now and I'm not convinced it's worth the $$$ especially with its complexities. This software is not for a novice or even an intermediate user because it demands a complete and thorough understanding of what is going on in the background. If C3D is truly seeking to market to Land Surveyors by saving us time this software needs streamlining thoroughly or Autodesk will lose Land Surveyors because it's product's complexity is simply not necessary.

 

Best Regards,

David Horsburgh 

Message 19 of 22

Jeff_M
Consultant
Consultant

@Anonymous, I've added this to the Civil 3D Ideas. Please go vote for it so it may get added in the future. Add a comment if you'd like as well.

 

 

Jeff_M, also a frequent Swamper
EESignature
Message 20 of 22

doni49
Mentor
Mentor

I don't have time right now to test this out myself but it sounds like this is only an issue when using survey figures as breaklines.  Correct?

 

You could explode them then reimport them as FEATURELINES.  Now that they're featurelines, use them for your breaklines.

 

Just a thought for a possible work-around.



Don Ireland
Engineering Design Technician




If a reply solves your issue, please remember to click on "Accept as Solution". This will help other users looking to solve a similar issue. Thank you.


Please do not send a PM asking for assistance. That's what the forums are for. This allows everyone to benefit from the question asked and the answers given.

0 Likes