Thank you. I did do exactly that Google search of course, but keep on coming back that whatever I want to truly answer the original question automatically gets me to a circular pattern of hexagons. They never wanted that. Ever diminishing sizes only can result in a circular pattern. Common sense.
The solution that came through Grasshopper was not sticking to the "seamless hexagons only" part of the original question posed to me. It clearly has triangles and goes into other shapes, and is not seamless.
I will dive into dynamo more though.
