I REALLY Need Some Help With Understanding the UCS and Custom Connections

I REALLY Need Some Help With Understanding the UCS and Custom Connections

Anonymous
Not applicable
2,583 Views
12 Replies
Message 1 of 13

I REALLY Need Some Help With Understanding the UCS and Custom Connections

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi,

 

With regard to creating custom connections and the UCS, I would really appreciate if someone could point me in the right direction for a decent tutorial that explains in detail what works with the UCS and what is broken with the UCS.

 

I quite clearly am not "getting it" with regards to the UCS and it seems that no matter what orientation I draw\save my custom joints I always seem to end up with errors.

 

I really need some rules to follow.......

 

Appreciate your help

0 Likes
2,584 Views
12 Replies
Replies (12)
Message 2 of 13

Emanuel.Nestor
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

Hi Dave,

Thank you for posting your request here.

You might find useful this dedicated class presented at Autodesk University:

You will find the video, the handout and the additional materials there.

I hope it will help you.

 

Best regards,
Emy



Emy Nestor
0 Likes
Message 3 of 13

Anonymous
Not applicable

Many thanks for taking the time to respond Emy it is much appreciated however, the documentation does not really discuss the UCS other than in the third example where it says that it needs to be moved to the posts system line - after doing this I note that the orientation of my UCS is different to that which is in the documentation and if I further try to draw a polyline as requested it does not start at the system post line where I placed the UCS rather it starts at where the original UCS was before I moved it.

 

All very confusing stuff.

 

I only want to be able to have an item, a right angle bracket that can be in either 12 o'clock, 3 o'clock, 6 o'clock or 9 o'clock positions.

 

I started with the bracket in the 6 o'clock position and this seems to work with no problems.

 

However, either drawing the 12 o'clock position from scratch or mirroring the 6 o'clock or rotating the 6 o'clock I always end up with the bracket upside down and back to front when placing as a new connection.

 

I appreciate items have their own internal UCS that can be altered however, I do not understand what's behind this and I believe that I can only draw my wireframes without using mirror\rotate commands as these somehow interfere with generated sections and connections.

 

I find I need to draw my wireframes from new and apply sections in specific view directions so as not to have to alter the sections position.

 

I also have an anomaly with the UCS\origin when changing certain views see the following screenshots:

 

Top View showing Z axis coming out the screen

 

Top 1st.png

 

Then go to South East view with Z axis going up the screen as expected

 

SE1.png

 

Now a FRONT view showing the Z axis either coming out the screen or going away from the screen, either way it's not what I expected

 

FRONT 1st.png

 

And now back to a SE view showing the Z axis in a different orientation from the SE Z axis two pictures above again, not what I expected.

 

SE2.png

 

I am finding it impossible to keep track of these changes without any rules to understand why it won't do what I want it to or expect.

 

I appreciate that it is my stupidity that is stopping me from getting this hence my request for a link to a detailed tutorial that explains these anomalies and not only how to change the UCS but why it is being changed?

0 Likes
Message 4 of 13

muleman1
Advisor
Advisor

@Anonymous when creating your custom connections, you have to create one for each possible orientation in relation to your UCS. For instance, if you had sections of safety rails that fit between wooden posts and you needed a custom tab at each corner, you would have to create an upper left, upper right, lower left and lower right custom connection. In other words, a 'left-handed' connection will not work in a 'right-handed' application. You should be able to work with your world UCS orientation, changing it only to apply features (cuts and notches) or bolts or holes.

 

I hope this helps and does not further frustrate and/or confuse you. We ourselves are far from experts, but we try to help. If this doesn't help, post an image of the connection you want with basic info and we will try to make a screencast for you.

....How easy it is to acquire knowledge, yet how difficult and painstaking is the process of gaining wisdom. .... Chuck Swindoll
0 Likes
Message 5 of 13

Anonymous
Not applicable

Muleman,

 

Thanks for your input, I do appreciate that I have to create separate joints relative to their orientation.

 

In this instance I am trying to create a joint between two C sections using a 90 degree angle bracket at the twelve o'clock position or if you like the top connection of a jamb to a header.

 

This first image shows the joint created with the bracket inside the vertical C section and attaching to the underside of the headers flange.

 

Joint Creation.png

This next picture is of the joint above being used in different drawing you'll note how the bracket is reversed whereby the flange connection is now outside of the C section and is therefore useless and not what I want.

 

Joint Output.png

 

I have tried changing both the bracket and vertical C sections internal UCS but it always shows the bracket outside as in the second picture.

 

I have no idea what I am doing wrong or for that matter how to fix this issue.

 

 

0 Likes
Message 6 of 13

muleman1
Advisor
Advisor

Dave, I cant see what you are pointing out. I never have been able to use the wireframe mode, especially with the dark color scheme.  I think its my eyesight...LOL. Can you attach your model to a post? or better yet, a new dwg with just a sample of the condition you are experiencing? 

....How easy it is to acquire knowledge, yet how difficult and painstaking is the process of gaining wisdom. .... Chuck Swindoll
0 Likes
Message 7 of 13

Anonymous
Not applicable

Thanks, please see attached dwg I have changed the sections to be Steadmans STM 17020 C sections to allow you to test originally I had them as STM 150 but you won't have these.

 

 

0 Likes
Message 8 of 13

AleckGiles
Mentor
Mentor

Hi,

 

How was the side rail drawn in your second image (full model)? If it was drawn using the Purlins macro (SEPurlin) then that is your problem. There is a known issue with applying user custom connections to beams drawn with this macro. The positions get confused. Try deleting the joint box around the purlins so they are independant and applying your joint again. It works fine for me on two manually drawn sections.

 

Aleck Giles, Structures Consultant, Graitec
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

LinkedIn

Autodesk Certified Instructor - Gold

0 Likes
Message 9 of 13

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi,

 

I have drawn the rail using the Beam From Line command which I believe is different from the SEPurlin macro?

 

I narrowed the issue down to being in either the horizontal side rail or the vertical jamb as I found that using the joint in a new drawing it worked as expected, this led me to believe the joint is fine.

 

To rectify I tried changing the internal UCS of both the side rail and jamb - the UCS did change however, when applying the joint it was still upside down and back to front no matter what orientation I changed the internal UCS to.

 

What worked was to go to a left view and physically rotate the jamb through 180 degrees.

0 Likes
Message 10 of 13

Anonymous
Not applicable

"What worked was to go to a left view and physically rotate the jamb through 180 degrees."

 

Well, the above solution worked for the joint at the top, it now places the joint correctly however, now when I try to place the base cleat connection at the bottom it doesn't work, well, it works but it is now placing the base cleat at the top of the section - before rotating the section through 180 degrees the base cleat connection worked fine, it was placed in the correct orientation at the bottom of the section.

 

Quite lost with this now and don't know what to try next

 

Appreciate your advice?

0 Likes
Message 11 of 13

AleckGiles
Mentor
Mentor

HI,

 

As previously stated elsewhere User Connections have nothing to do with the UCS. They are controlled by the internal UCS of the driver objects selected - mostly Driver 1. It is not possible to change the internal UCS of a beam after it has been created.

 

Therefore a joint at the Start of a beam to a passing main beam would likely be considered at a different orientation to a joint at the End of the same beam. Unless a joint is symmetrical it is not likely you will be able to get the same joitn to work at both ends of a beam.

 

If you want the same joint at the top and bottom of your post you will probably need to make 2 user connections. If you draw some posts bottom up and others top down you will have to guess which joint will work when you place them. If you are consistent and draw all posts bottom up then you should be safe calling the two joint versions "Top" and "Bottom" and using them accordingly.

 

 

 

Aleck Giles, Structures Consultant, Graitec
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

LinkedIn

Autodesk Certified Instructor - Gold

Message 12 of 13

muleman1
Advisor
Advisor

@Anonymous please view this short screencast to see if it makes sense... 

 

 

....How easy it is to acquire knowledge, yet how difficult and painstaking is the process of gaining wisdom. .... Chuck Swindoll
Message 13 of 13

Anonymous
Not applicable

Guys, many thanks for all your help on this matter and special thanks to @muleman1 for taking the time to create a screencast - very helpful for the reverse beam situation, not something we've had to do but certainly worth considering for certain situations.

 

So, I am really happy to say that I have it working now, given the advice and help I've received here.

 

Where I was going wrong was when creating the joint in the 12 o'clock position I was selecting the drivers incorrectly, in my mind I had the vertical section as the Column or Driver 1 and the horizontal as the Beam or Driver 2. Once I had swapped these around to the Beam being Driver 1 and the column being Driver 2 it worked perfectly.

 

This change hadn't fully sunk in as when I moved onto the joint in the 6 ' o'clock position I was still selecting the vertical section as the column and needless to say it didn't work correctly but again swapping the Drivers around done the trick.

 

The 3 and 9 o'clock positions were relatively easy, re-drawing the bracket in a top view, rotating and folding it relative to where it was to be placed in the least amount of moves had them working in no time.

 

Anyway, here's the output

 

Working.png

 

Again, many thanks for your help and advice I'll no doubt be back for more!

 

 

0 Likes