Announcements

Welcome to ACC Ideas! View the ACC Product Roadmap here. Top-voted ideas may be considered for future development. Learn more about the feedback process here.

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Navisworks 2026 Issue Status Mapping - Doesn't follow ACC standards

Navisworks 2026 Issue Status Mapping - Doesn't follow ACC standards

Navisworks 2026 introduced a Clash Detective clash result status mapping to the ACC Issues status.

But the problem is the concept and order of these statuses in both products do not align very well. This causes confusion.

 

Starting in Navisworks the problem is quite noticeable with the 'Reviewed clash' and 'Approved clash' settings. In the below screenshot, they are mapped to their default ACC statuses.

ChadSmith_0-1752799847628.png

 

When you then review the Statuses in ACC, taking note of the 'Completed' and 'In review', you can see that they are not in the same order in which they are applied in the Navisworks mapping. It clearly says for Completed that it precedes In Review. 

This matters! When the issue is reviewed in ACC, changing to an incorrect status will affect further analysis in Navisworks.

ChadSmith_1-1752799978732.png

 

The core problem here is that ACC was primarily developed with field teams in mind, and therefore the Statuses and their order are defined for how construction issues are managed. This does not translate particularly well into the design space.

 

I would like to see Navisworks updated so that the Clash Detective aligns with appropriate ACC settings.

1 Comment
Chad-Smith
Advisor

Something went wrong with my original post as none of the text is visible, only the images. But the text is visible when I edit the post.

Not sure if this was caused by the forum updates.

Appears to now be fixed.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Submit Idea