Announcements

Welcome to ACC Ideas! View the ACC Product Roadmap here. Top-voted ideas may be considered for future development. Learn more about the feedback process here.

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Improve Aggregate By functionality

Improve Aggregate By functionality

The "Aggregate By" setting in the Associated Costs section of a Budget Payment Application is inconsistent and doesn't always apply the desired aggregation method. Often, Expenses default to aggregating by Qty (Work Completed), even if Amount option was selected on a previous Pay App. This can result in major problems, such as a value increasing from $1,800 to $45,000. On large projects, errors like this can easily go unnoticed and, without detailed line-by-line verification, may lead to significant billing issues.

Even when a discrepancy is identified, it's often difficult to trace the issue back to its source without running multiple reports or manually reconstructing the data in Excel.

 

Additionally, when the Aggregate By field is set to Qty, the Amount value should reflect the actual value being pulled into the Pay App. For example, if the total Expense is $1,800, then:

  • Aggregate by: Amount (Work Completed) should reflect that $1,800
  • Aggregate by: Qty (Work Completed) should reflect the calculated value based on quantity and rate

Currently, the Amount column doesn’t change accordingly, even though the Pay App value does, which makes it difficult to validate data against Expense reports by billing period.

Some potential adjustments that could make this feature more transparent:

  • Set a default Aggregate By setting at the project level for both Payment Applications and Expenses
  • Receive clearer visibility or warnings about which aggregation method is being used and how it impacts the Work Completed value
4 Comments
Jason_Kai_Jiang
Autodesk
Status changed to: Gathering Support

@emodderman: We enhanced the behavior: if the Expense item's unit is lumpsum (ls/LS), the system will automatically set it as "Aggregate by Amount (Work Completed)". Then your example, the aggregation costs will aggregate $1,800 to the corresponding budget payment application's item.
Note: for all other units' Expense items, the default aggregation method will still be "Aggregate by Qty (Work Completed)".

 

Please validate the behavior. If you have any improvement ideas, please reply on this post.

 

Thanks.

emodderman
Advocate

@Jason_Kai_Jiang 
Unfortunately, I tested this and although it does aggregate by Qty (Work Completed), the Amount is still pulled into the % column on the PayApp. This total of expenses should only be $6000, yet it is reading over $65k. 

emodderman_1-1762354329333.png

 

Jason_Kai_Jiang
Autodesk

@emodderman 
Thanks for the validation.

The second Expense's aggregation method is "Qty (Work Completed)" that means the system will use the Expense subitem's Qty to multiply the unit cost of "this period work completed" on payment item level.

If you would like to aggregate by Amount, please switch the aggregate by option on the second Expense.

BTW: What is the unit of the Expense subitem (linked with a Budget) of the second Expense ($1,500) ?

Thanks.

emodderman
Advocate

@Jason_Kai_Jiang 
Thank you. I see where I was going wrong. 

My Unit for the second Expense was Hr. 15 hr @ $100/hr, $1500 total. My mistake was on the related Budget line, which was in LS, so the math wasn't mathing. User error while trying to run a quick test. 

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Submit Idea