Currently, Autodesk Construction Cloud (ACC) limits the number of assignees per Submittal to a maximum of 10 users. For large-scale construction projects, this limitation creates significant workflow challenges. We strongly request increasing this limit to at least 30 individual assignees.         Background & Problem Statement     ACC Submittals are designed to track review status per individual assignee, which is a very valuable capability for accountability and auditability.   However, the current limitation causes issues because:   Submittals often require review by many individual stakeholders, not just roles or companies Role-based or Company-based assignees do not fit workflows where: Individual approval status must be visible Review history needs to be tracked per person   Individual-based assignment is essential for: Compliance Accountability Long-term record keeping of who reviewed what and when             Business Impact     Due to the 10-user assignee limit, teams managing large projects are forced to:   Create multiple duplicate Submittals for the same document Partially revert to manual or paper-based workflows Use additional tools outside ACC to complete reviews     This significantly reduces efficiency and undermines ACC’s value as a centralized platform for large projects.   Additionally, Submittals templates often reach the maximum limit (250 templates) more quickly due to duplicated workflows created solely to bypass the assignee restriction.         Requested Enhancement     Increase the maximum number of individual Submittals assignees to at least 30 users Maintain the current functionality of: Individual review status visibility Per-user approval history tracking             Expected Benefits     Enables ACC to fully support large and complex project workflows Eliminates the need for duplicate Submittals and manual processes Improves adoption of ACC as a true enterprise-level construction management platform         This enhancement would significantly improve usability for teams managing large-scale projects and better align ACC Submittals with real-world industry requirements.   Thank you for your consideration. Show More

I would like to be able to have progress photos I take auto fill the location. I have locations entered and the plans linked to them but I have to manually enter the location in the drop down "Location" tab after I take a photo. Can you make it to where if I select a room to take a picture it will auto fill that location. When I do that with "Issues" it will auto fill but not with photos. Show More

I (try to) manage all projects across the board. For example, when a new colleague joins, they sometimes have to be added to 3,000 active projects. Or when role permissions change (due to a change of function), those permissions have to be adjusted across all (more than 5,000) active projects.   Can a tool be created to manage active projects and in particular users, roles, folder rights for account admins? Show More

Simpler upload functionality to upload 000's of specifications allowing to skip version sets etc and shortening the upload process Show More

Ability for ACC Build Minutes of Meeting to be generated automatically by connecting MS Copilot/MS Teams Transcript or by Autodesk AI taking the minutes. Show More

Using Autodesk AI Assistant to generate BIM Execution Plan from the Customer requirements which are also uploaded into ACC Show More

After writing minutes of a meeting you need to notify and share with invitees. You can do this but it comes with a generic notification with no option to customize it. The request is, when sharing meetings, to have the option to send out a notification with a customized subject and message. An example of this can be seen in Cost Management when sending out contracts, you can customize the subject and the message (see screenshot attached). Show More

If Location, Tag or Uploaded By information has been added to a photo record, display that information along with Description and Date in references on Forms and Exports.   This simple addition would make producing punch and observation reports easier and clearer for the report reader. Show More

We use our phone list generated from ACC to place in our O&M manuals at the the end of the project, we also throughout the project will create a phone list for site to reference, it would be extremely helpful if we could input the members title so we know who to call for certain situations. Please, pretty please, make this happen!!!!??? Show More

Current Limitation: In Autodesk Construction Cloud (ACC) Submittals, reviewer-related date information (such as review start date, response date, or reviewer action dates) is correctly captured within the platform and is also available when exporting submittal data to PDF format. However, when exporting the same submittal data to Excel, these reviewer date fields are not included in the Excel output. Business Impact: This limitation makes it difficult for project teams to perform reporting, tracking, and analysis using Excel, especially for audit purposes, schedule tracking, and management reporting where reviewer timelines are required. Expected Enhancement: The Excel export for Submittals should include the same reviewer date fields that are currently available within the platform and reflected in the PDF export. Benefit: Providing consistent data across PDF and Excel exports will improve reporting accuracy, reduce manual workarounds, and enhance overall usability for project controls and documentation teams. Show More

The Autodesk Account administration framework within manage autodesk  lacks adequate permission granularity between the User and Secondary Admin roles. Organizations must elevate users to Secondary Admin simply so they can perform routine user and product management tasks. This creates unnecessary security exposure, increases compliance risk, and violates least privilege principles. Autodesk customers need an intermediate permission level that enables operational management without granting high-risk administrative authority. Current Issue Current ACC permission models force large organizations to assign Secondary Admin roles for routine tasks such as user management, product and entitlement assignment, group management, and running usage reports. However, the Secondary Admin role also grants high-risk capabilities, including user removal, role elevation, access to account-wide configuration, sensitive settings, and broader administrative visibility than is operationally necessary. This creates exposure to critical controls, increases the risk of accidental misconfiguration or improper access changes, makes it difficult to enforce least-privileged security, meet compliance requirements, and pass internal IT audits.   There is no defined role between User and Secondary Admin to support controlled, practical user lifecycle and reporting responsibilities. Proposed Solution Create a new “User Management Admin” role - A purpose-built, limited-privilege role to perform operational user management. Capabilities should include: View and manage user accounts Edit external → user roles only (no elevation beyond User) Assign and unassign products Assign and unassign groups Access, view, and export usage and product reporting Restrictions should include: Cannot delete users Cannot promote users to Secondary Admin or higher Cannot modify billing, subscriptions, or account-level configurations Cannot modify security policies This role enables functional administration without compromising organizational security posture.   Create a new “Download Access Admin” role - A role focused solely on installation access without administrative control. Capabilities should include: Download Autodesk products and services Manage installation packages where applicable   Restrictions should include: Cannot manage user permissions This allows organizations to separate installation responsibilities from administrative control. Advantages Security & Compliance Supports zero-trust and least-privilege models Reduces risk of: accidental user removal inappropriate role elevation unauthorized access to billing and account configuration Improves alignment with SOC2, ISO 27001, and internal audit requirements Operational Experience Allows IT departments to safely delegate user onboarding/offboarding tasks Reduces administrative bottlenecks without expanding admin exposure Enables non-admin departments (VDC, PMO, BIM support, etc.) to manage licenses responsibly Reduced confusion over Secondary Admin responsibilities Autodesk Strategic Value Enhances Autodesk’s position as an enterprise-ready platform Helps large customers meet internal governance requirements Reduces friction for large customers managing complex environments Demonstrates Autodesk’s commitment to secure and flexible administration models The Ask We are requesting that Autodesk introduce more granular permissions in manage.autodesk.com by adding an intermediate User Management Administrator role (between User and Secondary Admin) and a separate Download Access Administrator role, enabling product assignment, group management, and reporting access without user deletion or role elevation, to reduce security risk and support least-privilege administration.   Show More

When creating a new template->"Build a new form"->"Select a starting template" the user is presented with a list of templates to start a template creation from. This list must be editable in some way, at least to project admins who would be able to add or remove starting templates suggestions from this list. These starting templates are key when developing large sets of templates that have commonalities such as project details pages, signature pages, table pages and such which would be common over a range of templates (and forms).   These are the current list of templates (as of Jan 2026): Blank Template Daily Report Incident report Safety Checklist Covid-19 Safety Checklist Covid-19 Screening Checklist for jobsite visitors Show More

Problem Description: When merging IFC and Revit files into a single leading coordination model, I use the Model Coordination feature. From this environment, I save the combined model to Docs so that all project members can view it. However, I’m missing two key functionalities: Linking Sheets: It’s currently not possible to link sheets (floor plans, details, etc.) to the combined coordination model. This limits context and makes it difficult to navigate directly from the combined model to relevant drawings. Mini-map / Reference: There is no mini-map visible in the combined model, which means the reference to the floor plan or room is missing. This makes it harder to quickly orient yourself within the model and understand the location of elements. Why is this important? Linking sheets to the combined model would significantly improve workflow, allowing users to jump directly from the coordination model to relevant drawings. A mini-map or reference overlay would enhance navigation and spatial context, especially for large and complex projects. Proposed Solution: Add an option to link sheets to combined models in Model Coordination. Implement a mini-map or reference overlay in the viewer so users always know where they are in the model. Impact: These improvements would greatly enhance collaboration and coordination within projects and create a more integrated experience between 3D models and 2D documentation. Show More

We need the option when pulling in documents into the OCO to be able to pull in the Merged PCO documents instead of all the individual documents from the PCO.  Pro's: Pulling in the Merged PCO.pdf is a cleaner when reviewing the PCO to make sure all the PCO's backup has been attached Easier to follow Ensures we are using the same document that was used as backup in the PCO approval process in the OCO. that the Owner. Con's: Existing process pulls in all the individual documents Makes it harder to understand what document belongs to what PCO Difficult to ensure all the documents are in the correct order. Allows users to delete out documents that the owner has already seen in the PCO approval process.    There is a work around but it is time consuming.  You have to "attach from Autodesk Docs" go find the folder the merged document is saved on and click on it to attach it.        Show More

Problem Description: When a user is mentioned in the comments section of an issue, they are not automatically added as a follower of that issue. As a result, they only receive a single email notification and cannot easily filter or track the issue afterward. This often leads to missed action points because the mentioned user is not actively subscribed to updates. Why is this important? Users who are mentioned are usually relevant to the discussion or action, so they should stay informed about any updates. Without automatic following, important tasks can be overlooked, reducing accountability and slowing down workflows. Proposed Solution: When a user is mentioned in an issue comment, automatically add them as a follower of that issue. Alternatively, provide an option to enable this behavior as a project setting. Impact: This improvement would ensure that mentioned users remain engaged and informed, reducing the risk of missed actions and improving collaboration and issue resolution. Show More

  It would be helpful to add Project Admin Locations as Docs attributes. In this way all files in Docs will be aligned to project standard locations in a consistent way. Show More

We’d like to share a feature request related to Review Templates management in Submittals, based on feedback from customers managing large-scale projects.     Background     In large and mega-size projects (especially in Japan), customers often manage 100–200+ review templates within a single project. At the same time, project members frequently change over the course of the project (e.g. reviewers joining or leaving every few months).   Because approvals are required per individual person (not just by role or company), review templates need to be updated frequently to reflect these membership changes.     Current Challenge     Today, all review template updates must be done manually through the ACC Web UI.   This creates several pain points:   Updating many templates one by one is very time-consuming The UI panel is small, making it difficult to: Search for the correct workflow/template Identify which reviewers need to be removed or added   Bulk updates (e.g. replacing reviewers across many templates) are not supported     For customers managing hundreds of templates, this becomes a significant operational burden.     Requested Capability     Customers are asking for a way to manage review templates in bulk, ideally through an Excel-based workflow, such as:   Export current review templates to Excel (including template name, step number, reviewers per step) Edit reviewers and steps in Excel Import the updated Excel file back into ACC to apply changes     Alternative solutions (bulk edit UI, API-based bulk updates, etc.) could also work, but export/import via Excel would align best with existing customer workflows.     Expected Benefits     Significant time savings for Submittals managers Reduced risk of manual errors Easier management of frequent reviewer changes Better scalability for large and long-running projects     Is this type of bulk management capability on the roadmap, or is there any recommended approach today for handling this at scale?   Thank you for considering this request. Show More

In addition to triggering review flows, it would be very useful to extend the scope of Auto-Triggers to other actions such as auto-filling attributes according to defined conditions.   Show More

Specify default (prepopulated) value for a field when editing the attribute or in a naming standard. Fields are left blank until a user fills it. It would be helpful if we could specify a default value for specific fields, so that the user does not have to type it in or select it from a list, unless it requires another value.  Show More