Something that I have found to be problematic on several projects is that clashes understandably leave the clash pool upon being assigned to an issue. This behaviour is fine and logical until a project member goes full tilt creating issues from clashes, or you realise just after creating the issue that something was incorrectly included/excluded. In these cases depending on how widespread the impact is the only real workaround is to set up a whole new coordination space or reuploading the affected models-both being unideal solutions.   What would be greatly helpful is to basically have an option where by in these situations the issue can be deleted/deactivated and all those clashes return back to the clash pool for future review. As it stands, when clashes are marked as 'not an issue' we have the option to restore the clashes to the pool. It seems logical to have this exact same functionality for clashes that incorrectly or prematurely get assigned to an issue. Show More

Overview Today, Autodesk Build Forms only support the creation of interactive forms through manual field creation or by uploading a PDF. However, many construction workflows rely heavily on Excel-based templates that include formulas, conditional logic, predefined data structures, and standardized layouts. When attempting to convert these Excel files into PDF to use them in Autodesk Build, much of this logic is lost. Problem Our teams frequently work with Excel templates that are already validated internally and used across multiple projects. These files often contain formulas that automatically calculate values, ensure consistency, and reduce manual input errors. When converting these templates to PDF, the formulas and built-in logic are removed, resulting in a non-interactive and error-prone form within Autodesk Build. Requested Feature We would like Autodesk Build to support Excel (.xlsx) upload directly as a Form template, preserving: -Cell formulas -Conditional formatting -Dropdown lists / data validation -Locked/protected cells -Predefined calculation fields -Embedded metadata Build would then automatically convert the Excel structure into a fully interactive form, similar to the existing PDF auto-field detection, but without losing the business logic native to Excel. Why This Matters -Reduces manual work and repeated form rebuilding -Avoids errors caused by manual data entry -Leverages existing company-standard templates -Improves consistency across project teams -Allows organizations to maintain a single source of truth for engineered forms -Enhances adoption of Autodesk Build across field teams Show More

So, they did it again. As of september Business Units finally came available to use in ACC. Big huray moment. That didn't last. First it was visible for the our project creators, but they could not select/set it. Only the account admin was able to use it. So we opened a case for that. The solution? Remove visibility of the function for projectcreators..... So basically, the whole function is now unusable. You can't set business unit in a project template (which would be preferred, but at least would be a workaround if you don't want project creators to assign the business unit). So the account admin has to create ALL projects if you need to use businiss units? That's like having a CEO write out all paychecks personally for all employees..... The answer from Autodesk: it's by desing... (again). We are so disappointed with this. PLEASE, PLEASE make this workable, let it either be setup in the project templates (which would be the best option) or let it at least be assigned by project creators! Show More

While there is an option to check or uncheck Revit sheet sets in the package the selection of set selection is not propagated to the shared model. Either remove the checks or include or exclude them as per user input. Show More

Hi all,  I'm a land surveyor, I do construction staking. I get invited to all kinds of jobs through this site, it's great. But it's time consuming to bid the same job for the same price, with the same qualifications and insurances to each individual general contractor. From my perspective, this site has great potential for sub contractors but falls short. Ideally the owner or developer would post the job, sub contractors in the area would be notified and have an opportunity to place a bid for their services, including their qualifications and insurances. Then the general contractors could incorporate those bids into their final bid. Of course there needs to be opportunities for price changes due to addendums and such. Right now I have to wait until the bid due date is nearly elapsed in order to not have to re submit my bid due to a change that does not affect me. If I submit a bid when the job first arrives I have to re submit over and over again, for every addendum. In short I just want to look at the plans and post a bid, list my qualifications, and be done, maybe even get the job.  Show More

We would like the project invite email notification to be manageable through Project Notification Settings.   Our company supports multiple portfolio clients with many smaller projects. We have internal operations support team members who need to be added to every project by default. However, whenever a new project is created from a template, or when users are added manually, those team members receive an invite email notification.   Because we often open 10–20 new projects per week, this creates excessive notifications and adds unnecessary noise for internal teams, customers, and suppliers.   Current Behavior When users are added from a template, or the project members screen, the system automatically sends an invite email notification. There are currently ways to add members without an invite through certain project tool menus (example: Contracts), but this functionality is not available through the Project Members screen, which is the primary member management area.   Business Impact High-volume project creation and member assignment generates repeated invite emails that: overwhelm internal teams who are added to every project cause customers to receive more notifications than necessary create confusion or frustration for suppliers receiving repeated invites increase the chance that important emails are missed due to “notification fatigue” Use Case Scenarios Operations team members added to every project Our Safety, Insurance, Finance, and Labor Compliance users need visibility on all projects for setup, administration, troubleshooting, reporting, and ongoing coordination and cannot be left waiting for access. No opt outs available There is no current opt out for our teams or our clients to manage the email notifiers they are receiving and can create perceived annoyance and ongoing frustrations while trying to maintain portfolio visibility. Bulk onboarding or transitions During onboarding or team member transitions, we may add a user to many projects they are newly joining. The invite emails create clutter and distract from real action-required notifications, and depending on the team members role could result in hundreds of notifications in the case of a new operations support team member.  Adding members for recordkeeping rather than collaboration Sometimes external users are added to projects to support internal documentation, centralizing project contacts, optional project document access, or reporting purposes, not because they need to actively log in or participate. Sending an invite in these cases provides no value and contributes to unnecessary communication and confusion.   Show More

When creating a Safety Violation or other Issue type from an iPad or mobile device, there is currently no ability to enter a Title.   Because of this, all Issues created in the field display the same default title (e.g., “SAFETY VIOLATION”) when reviewed on a desktop. This makes it difficult for project teams to quickly identify, prioritize, or search for specific Issues—especially on projects with a high volume of field-generated items.   Adding a Title field to the mobile / ipad would allow field staff to capture brief, meaningful descriptions at the time of creation, improving clarity, traceability, and efficiency for both field and office teams reviewing and managing Issues. Show More

Currently, when bridging sheets from one project to another, the version history is not maintained in the new project. Carrying the prior versions through the bridging process would make maintaining an accurate history significantly easier when working in the new project. It should be noted that this is a different use case than the existing "Maintain sync" functionality when bridging; even with this option enabled, preexisting versions are not carried over through the bridge. Show More

There should be an option to enable the weekly auto-publish for those using the Live Linking (LL) workflow WITHOUT having to enable Teams in Design Collaboration (DC).   Why? We don't need to publish for Share/Consume, BUT we do leverage published models for Model Coordination, for non-Revit users to view/markup/comment in Docs, to share models via Bridge, etc.    Problem with creating the Team in DC: If permissions (by company) have been given to folders PRIOR to creating the Team in DC, when you add the Team to turn on the auto-publish, EVERY company within that Docs folder will have their permissions elevated to Edit (WITHOUT NOTIFICATION). This is BAD when using the Live Linking workflow, as it now enables other disciplines the ability to "open" other's models when the intended workflow is for others to only link.   You can reference this document for the workaround, but it's a pain... https://www.autodesk.com/support/technical/article/caas/sfdcarticles/sfdcarticles/Permissions-elevated-to-Edit-on-their-own-after-Team-is-added-in-Design-Collaboration.html   Show More

When adding new users on the ACC or BIM360 platforms, it is necessary to add them individually by logging into each project. In the account management section, we request the creation of a dashboard structure where users can be assigned to projects in bulk (by ticking them). Do you have any alternative methods to simplify this process? Show More

Hi all,   Could you please release the POST API for the Files tool's naming convention? It would greatly improve global admin administration for a large number of projects. Rather than spending time manually selecting each of the desired folders, a script could be run to do this from one place.   Thanks for your attention to this matter. Bye Show More

This would save us a lot of time when a submittal has been inadvertently voided.   Show More

It would be so helpful to have an option to pin or favourite a file, and be able to have all the favourites in one place with quick links. In the sea of documents, some can easily escape you if they have a document number or title that doesn't quite reveal what's within them. Show More

IFCSpaces are helpful model objects for calculating quantities, such as surface areas. Currently, IFCSpace items are not treated as physical objects within the Autodesk Construction Cloud viewer which means that they cannot be used. It would be helpful to close this gap so that every model object, including IFCSpaces, can be used for quantity takeoff. Show More

Currently, Autodesk Construction Cloud does not allow users to crop or snip content within the PDF viewer. If a user wants to highlight a specific portion of a drawing, they must use an external tool to capture the area and then upload it as a separate attachment—not as an overlay on the PDF. This creates several challenges: Workflow Disruption: Switching between ACC and external apps slows down reviews. Loss of Context: Uploaded images are detached from the PDF and do not appear in exports. Inefficient Communication: Teams cannot quickly isolate and share critical details without extra steps. Proposed Solution A built-in snip tool would allow users to drag-select any area of a sheet or document, crop it, and embed it directly into the markup layer. This would streamline the user experience, eliminate external dependencies, and improve clarity in communication and issue resolution. Show More

Possibility to archive photos in Build Show More

I have a suggestion with regards to measuring, would be to have the square that is solid be transparent with crosshairs.  Other apps have  a crosshairs tool that is transparent so you could see where it lined up more accurately.  In the Build app, users report the tool being a little clunky as they are not sure where to start their measurement and have difficulty finding it under their finger. Show More

Hello,  There are several areas for improvement regarding the BCF export in ACC : ACC doesn't export custom parameters ACC doesn't export "Assign to" field ACC does not export the issue’s exact location (pinpoint). Instead, it only exports the camera position, which is completely different. In addition, the camera position is exported using the internal coordinate system rather than the shared coordinate system. As a result, the BCF file becomes incompatible with other software and important location information is missing.   Thanks again to the entire dev team for your support and hard work! Show More

Hi there, It would be great if there was a search function when adding projects to sync in Desktop Connector. It would be ideal for it to work in the same way as the filter search in Microsoft Excel, so could just start typing a project name / number and it would pop up. We have lots of different projects and they're raised in project number order. So if a team member doesn't know the project number, they have to scroll through them all to find it.  Thanks!  Show More